

Wow. A lawsuit where I can’t root for either side.
That said, “knowingly” aired sure is a stretch. Did they also “knowingly” have any evidence that what they were airing was true? Or was it just a rumor they heard? Did they use the term “allegedly” during this airing? You can’t just make up crap about someone and not lose a libel* suit. Unless you’re Fox “News” I guess.
Note that he wasn’t suing over reporting that he was involved in Jan 6. He was suing because Fox reported that, “Epps, 62, was an undercover government agent who helped incite the Capitol attack to entrap Trump supporters.”
(Quote comes from story linked within the posted story.)
*libel might not be the correct term to use here. I don’t know what is.




























By “drained” they mean stole.
“One water connection had been installed without the utility’s knowledge, and the other was not linked to the company’s account and therefore wasn’t being billed.”