I use it to study med. If anyone wants a fun way to memorise cancer treatments here you go. I find ai songs for study extremly useful.

https://suno.com/playlist/b0722434-83a3-45db-a874-9edff53013bc

Ew I. Accidently clicked on a twitter link I ieel so dirty

And yet it’s still garbage…like their search

Holy shit, do you have some more info or refs for this, this sounds unbelievably fucked up.

Another quality VERGE article i see…

https://www.waterfox.net/

Also Firefox but less shitty.

Then how the fuck do you think they’re hidden doofus. Every second passenger tries to pull them.

If you owned one you’d know i guess. The M3 has un hidden regular door pulls on the inside both front and rear doors. Idk about the Y.

I know it’s cool to hate Tesla, but wrong is wrong, despite the downvotes.

Lol its not hidden at all.

Same

There’s plenty of info if you google your comment.

https://www.salon.com/2022/02/07/spotify-joe-rogan-artists-subscribers/

https://www.nytimes.com/2024/02/02/arts/joe-rogan-spotify.html

Etc etc

Same

I fucked off Spotify after the Jo Rogan debacle.

As a, Tesla owner i agree. Musk is awful and Tesla are heading down the toilet. I’d never buy one agian.

https://media.tenor.com/fJ4z94CDdU0AAAAM/good-news.gif

Yes, i agree

Ok very long and detailed response, i was responding to the initial comments that explicitly said if you give ai a made up thing it will definitely hallucinate. Which i demonstrated to be false in (multiple times). I’m not suggesting it doesn’t hallucinate a lot of the time still, but the comments were making out its 100% broken, and it clearly works for many queries very effectively, despite its limited applications. Im just suggesting we don’t throw the baby out with the bathwater.

Oh ok thanks i thought this thread was about AI LLMs in general.

Weird i was downvoted for demonstrating the very thing that apparently (according to these very learned comments) AI can’t do, actually doing it well. Seems like irrational bubble hate to me, common on reddit but getting more so on Lemmy it seems. “that guys asking topic based questions that make our comments look poorly thought out and potentially wrong, burn him”

Just put this into GPT 4.

What’s your view of the fizbang Raspberry blasters?

Gpt ‘I’m not familiar with “fizbang Raspberry blasters.” Could you provide more details or clarify what they are?’

It’s a drink making machine from china

Gpt ‘I don’t have any specific information on the “fizbang Raspberry blasters” drink making machine. If it’s a new or niche product, details might be limited online.’

So, in this instance is didn’t hallucinate, i tried a few more made up things and it’s consistent in saying it doesn’t know of these.

Explanations?

VERGE articles seem to be getting worse over the years, they’ve almost reached Forbes level, yes this does raise some valid safety concerns. No Tesla isn’t bad just because it’s Tesla.

It doesn’t really give us the full picture. For starters, there’s no comparison with Level 2 systems from other car makers, which also require driver engagement and have their own methods to ensure attention. This would help us understand how Tesla’s tech actually measures up.

Plus, the piece skips over extremely important stats that would give us a clearer idea of how safe (or not) Tesla’s systems are compared to good old human driving.

We’re left in the dark about how Tesla compares in scenarios like drunk, distracted, or tired driving—common issues that automation aims to mitigate. (probably on purpose).

It feels like the article is more about stirring up feelings against Tesla rather than diving deep into the data. A more genuine take would have included these comparisons and variables, giving us a broader view of what these technologies mean for road safety.

I feel like any opportunity to jump on the Elon hate wagon is getting tiresome. (and yes i hate Elon too).