Removed by mod
“Once you’ve been to Gaza, you’ll never stop wanting to beat Benjamin Netanyahu to death with your bare hands.”
Removed by mod
Removed by mod
Removed by mod
Never said all ads are like that. Still wondering how much dystopian ads like that bring along in actual value.
And now they are also making everyone agree to having their data splurged up by the giant monstrosity that is now google: share or die.
All disguised as real choices 😁
I wonder how many sales really go down just driven by the dystopian internet ads that pop up into your face or hide half the screen…
Too many bells are ringing
Yeh because it’s just like having their dumb parents do homework for them
I’ve been using it for a while and by far the biggest issue is how giant the backup file is and now about 3Gb of data were lost because of a signal version mismatch between an old phone I was using and the new one I switched to.
I can’t wait for Microsoft to kill itself.
Is this the next Chiquita?
No one requested self driving cars. Goodbye.
No one ever requested screens instead of buttons. It’s probably some BS some CEO came up with and forced the engineers to implement.
Is this article some kind of apple propaganda?
P. S: I fucking hate Windows.
I found them to be useful because I usee to be in an erratic team where people either get a lot done or drag projects on for years. At least the project draggers had no place to hide when needing to report their project daily.
In my current job we only have these stand-up type meetings once weekly which made a big difference because many people had more interesting things to report and it wasn’t some kind of lip service, instead people were genuinely haring progress.
No to all cults in general, as a rule of thumb
Emphasis added. Storing files is not the problem. Nobody cared when they were just scanning and storing them. The problem arose when they started giving out copies. And worse, giving out copies without restriction - libaries “lend” ebooks by using DRM systems to try to ensure that only a specific number of copies are out “in circulation” at any given time, and so the big publishers have turned a blind eye to that.
But libraries do not do that to limit access… (I think, unless there is some kind of copyright law making it necessary to restrict access). Don’t they do do that because they have a limited number of book copies that they need to maintain to meet the book lending demands in their area? Seems to me like they are just trying ro maximise people’s access to books given the constraints. Any digital library can obviously do this much faster.
It’s not only that it discriminated against certain groups, but also that it in itself has a high enough error rate to make it unusable for any decision making. MAYBE to select people for screening, but we would be falling further down into a dystopian future.
At the current performance, none if these AIs should be involved in anything this critical.
This is not at all what I said. If a machine was complex enough to reason, all power to it. But these LLMs cannot.
Removed by mod