

It would be possible to set up that way, just couldn’t think of one off the top of my head that already allowed for picking both.
Also known as snooggums on midwest.social and kbin.social.
It would be possible to set up that way, just couldn’t think of one off the top of my head that already allowed for picking both.
You should really see a medical professional if you are able.
For last words though, I would go with “I never told anyone, but the…” [cough cough then dies] but it would be really hard to get the timing right.
Meh, funny stuff gets upvoted for being funny. At least the comment chains can be collapsed easily.
A voting system that differentiates between funny and informative would help, but sometimes comments are both…
taking 30% from devs by doing nothing.
If this was true steam would have failed from the start. Instead, the service actually does offer a ton of benefits to both users and developers/publishers including distribution of sales, updates, additional features like forums, friends, and other things that have varying levels of positive or negative benefits to different people. That isn’t even mentioning Proton or the steam deck, just what it between the makers of the games and the people who play them.
Lootboxes are bullshit, sure. He should have spread out the benefits more to the employees as well. But the 30% cut for ‘nothing’ is incorrect.
It is more so that the singer’s response to their reaction was to say she was shy or having an affair and it turned out to be the latter. That would be funny no matter who they were .
Him being a ceo was the cherry on top.
Wanting closure is a preference and does not apply to all games. Counter Strike 2 doesn’t have a story and there is zero closure for example.
The industry trying to force games into a live service model when they shouldn’t be is a problem, sure. There are a few games where the model actually is a benefit though, like Helldivers 2. Other than wrapping up things somehow while winding down the game there isn’t an opportunity for closure while an endless war is going on. The setting itself is why closure isn’t on the table.
So I agree with the overall idea as it applies to games in general, but it isn’t some universal truth.
Is used RIF because the web interface for reddit sucked, so when they killed APIs and went to monetizing user comments that was enough for me.
Tried a few things out for the fediverse (which is why I have several accounts of a similar age) as it seemed like a better version of reddit style discussion. Lemmy front end is good enough wjich is good as I tend to bounce between phone and PC.
The fediverse is like every other discussion environment like forums and other content aggregators, where most things are fine and a small subset of users are completely awful and some mods/admins are terrible and some small corners are extremely cliquish and hostile to outsiders. But overall the interface is good, moderation is not nit picky about cursing, and discussions in general are more enjoyable than on reddit and most forums.
It sure looks like this is displayed after peeling back the very top layer that is still slightly attached at the top right in the image.
So they most likely did not know this was a thing when they purchased it.
Yes, requiring people to be civil when discussing topics that negatively impact them directly stifles the ability to convey how much they are suffering. Being forced to be polite to oppressors is absolutely awful.
So one thing that is an inherent issue with the distributed structure is inconsistent rules. There are instance rules and community rules and similar communities on different instances don’t have the same server or community rules, and a feed like All or even Subscribed is listing a bunch of things with different rules for interaction and adding a requirement to know all the rules for each individual post is unrealistic. Sure, most comments are fine if someone isn’t a complete jackass, but that mostly means the rules are not relevant the majority of the time.
Did you read and understand both the instance and community rules before commenting here? I did not, and have no regrets.
Plus it isn’t just about the literal stuff, it is about not letting her have any stuff. Like if he didn’t keep everything, then he would see himself as ‘losing’.
It’s petty selfishness all the way down.
Radiohead 2: Electric Weeaboo
That is a lot of cankle…
Incompetence is more likely.
Or because the person you elected has Musk lay you off.
Aka supporting the party that fired you.
Something something mechaHitler.
You mean 50501000s?
If you are referring to this:
That is just someone who blurts out a thought they had after saying something else, pretty common with ADHD. Like at first they were thinking about wet shorts, which can get pretty uncomfortable fast if they aren’t made to get wet, then realized dresses might not have the same feeling since they aren’t connected in the middle. I could absolutely see myself saying something along these lines depending on the material of the clothing and the appearance of how it sticks to the body.
If you mean the wife’s reaction then asking her would be necessary because I have no idea where she is coming from that would make something like that sound sexist.