Nope, it’s based on the fact she’s had to prove she’s a woman before she can enter international sports events and tournaments.

None of that is my logic, that’s your dog shit interpretation. Because you think in such a fashion does not mean the rest of us do.

She is a woman, perhaps with high testosterone readings as many women have but she’s still a woman. Your current Olympic Women’s gold medallist in the relevant division, what’s more.

How about you arseholes just leave her alone to enjoy her achievements? Something you’d never get close to.

More than you do that she isn’t. Your link was dogshit. She may have high testosterone et al counts for a woman but she is still a woman.

Beyond that you are well aware that a) I haven’t looked at her naked body and b) probably aware that I’m not a sports or medical scientist connected to her career so stop your bullshit; it’s a lazy, garbage call to make. The evidence I have is that she represents a Muslim country and they would make damn sure she’s a woman.

She’s certainly a lot closer to a woman than a man that’s for sure. Furthermore, she’s been beaten in competition by other women, so she can be beaten.

I can tell you don’t have a great understanding of the boxing world. I’ll say this much; there’s a lot of women boxers with high natural hormonal counts. They’re tough women with quite a few of them well toward the male end of the spectrum. I know some of them can’t wait to have a crack at Khelif because they know shes the best, both physically and mentally.

Time to pack it up ay? You don’t know what you’re talking about.

is not trans

Correct. She’s a woman. That’s why her country allowed her to box as one.

Polite and perverted.

I don’t know. Perhaps I’ll start with the fact it’s highly unlikely a Muslim country would allow a trans male to represent them in boxing at the Olympics?

How about you pass that bar first?

There’s also the problem of government supported solar only being available to homeowners, which means a vast number of households aren’t in the program. Those renters are the ones that fund it without benefit.

Another one of the points of separation between Australia A and the rest of us.

That’s a terrible link. There’s no evidence there whatsoever.

Khelif is a woman.

One thing I will point out as an Aussie who knows the system well…here, the preference choice is given to the voter, not the party unless the voter is happy with that. We can choose to vote the whole ticket or just vote 1 and let that party delegate our preferences.

I always mark the whole ticket. Typically, for me it’s #1 Green, then a raft of independents dependent on their standing, Labor usually third last then One Nation and the Coalition last. Parties do negotiate here about who they’ll preference and that can come down to electorate as well. Generally however, Greens will preference Labor and ON et al will preference the Liberals. Where a preference goes however is at the discretion of the voter unless they just vote 1 for their preferred party.

Why would he? They’ll fold. Both of the are custard spined.

Or stocks of much needed rare earths to build these things is in short supply.

Hey? Unreal you blokes.

First you tell people from other countries to mind their own business when they tell you to take part in the easy method of dealing with it, then double down on it. Now you think other countries, who you told to mind their own business, should deal with those subhumans because you blokes can’t deal with it at the polling booth nor within the judiciary. As you point out, you don’t have to worry then, because someone else is dealing with it.

At not one single point in this does the US take responsibility, it’s all palmed off to other nations. Developing ones at that.

I did, they’re right; these people can’t do the bare minimum. Plus they look for excuses like blaming the colour of the electorate.

The current leadership reflects those electorates and the participation, in every way. They really did get what they voted for, or didn’t.