If humanity can get through the next 100 years, there isn’t much that can kill us off. I’m hopeful.

nuclear isn’t that bad ngl France uses a ton of it

and the wastewater that nuclear power plants make, its barely radioactive at all

I’ve heard stuff like bittorent doesn’t work well when the data is often updated or changed

I might be totally wrong, I’ve only ever used it once when downloading Wikipedia

thats why we have space companies and a moon covered in mineable minerals ngl if humanity can figure out some way of sending everyone to space, we totally should might be better for the climate if done right

If solar was used everywhere then it would also require a large investment in batteries to power stuff in the night There’s pros and cons for everything and probably the best solution is to have several green energy sources, solar, wind, nuclear ect.

If one party promises to solve an issue to their voters, they can actually benefit from not doing enough about it so they can campaign with it again. If one party promises to not stop mass shootings, and the other benefits from promising to do something about them and then not doing enough, nothing much will happen. I really think this issue is a symptom of the two party system