![](/static/66c60d9f/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://fry.gs/pictrs/image/c6832070-8625-4688-b9e5-5d519541e092.png)
I’m sure Apple was dragged, kicking their feet and screaming all the way, into banning all the competing services too…
I’m sure Apple was dragged, kicking their feet and screaming all the way, into banning all the competing services too…
No, no. Let them cook. Let’s see what happens before they inevitably get banned.
Maybe cars should not be so easy to steal… I thought we came to an agreement on this.
This is kind of a survivorship bias kind of thing (with the WW2 bombers): NOT getting the news is the actual indicator of lack of quality control. Getting reports of them finding things is an indicator they’re actually looking. We know they had problems due to the whole, you know, planes falling out of the sky.
Of course it’s not black and white, what’s in the news isn’t really the important thing either way. It’s just what we can see.
I know Boeing is kind of fucking everything up right now, but safety delays are an indicator of safety, not the opposite.
Layoffs fundamentally change the tone of a company in a serious way. I think “chilling” is a good word.
I keep seeing people say this and
Obviously Muilenberg didn’t fix everything wrong with the company during his time there, for all i know he made it worse. However, i keep seeing this cited as some kind of own to the critique of modern Boeing and it isn’t. It just isn’t.
Man i don’t wanna buy a car made by people who aren’t sleeping in a bed. Come on, now.
If this is true it could kill Boeing. I’m not sure the DC-10 scandal was worse and that killed MD.
…And speak of the devil there’s a quote from an old MD CEO apparently bragging about fucking Boeing…
I mean we saw this in 2023. Companies fired people and replaced them with AI that was unable to do the job.
That depends on what your definition of “publicly available” is. If you’re scraping New York Times articles and pulling art off Tumblr then yeah, it’s exactly stealing in the same way scihub is. Only difference is, scihub isn’t boiling the oceans in an attempt to make rich people even richer.
I mean, some of them were presumably watching the Nazis.
Why do i get the feeling he cares more about that than about deadnaming trans people…
tldr they know what they’re doing.
Man, imagine how much better the world would be if accountants would face consequences when their decision was to blame?
Oh yeah he’s one of those guys. Of course.
They know the tech is out there, they just don’t want it and will only use as much of it as they are forced to.
There’s a reason why Tesla, a car company that was openly and explicitly set on building electric cars, was such a big deal.
The American auto industry could also produce EVs, if it so chose. Nobody has to lose their jobs.