So you thought you’d add your own inaccurate numbers, okay.

Stay out of my inbox now, thx.

The greatest appropriating committee, certainly. Development? Not yet

🥱

What does anything of that have to do with you quoting 50/200 as 25% not 4% 😂

good grief… 🤦‍♀️

I mean you really do not have to know anything about this technology or even physics at all to understand that they’re working on completely different parts of that technology. How can anyone have reading comprehension skills that bad and still need to die on their little hill?

Those two reports have literally nothing in common except the words „breakthrough“ and „solid-state batteries“, lol.

You absolutely don’t understand anything at all, so please just stop talking. Thank you.

And 7/200 is 3.5%, maybe you should read that article again…

Really, different countries are doing research on solid-state batteries, who’da thunk.

What does that have to do with China allegedly being an „appropriation committee“?

Sure, the chinese are just copying everything, they don’t research and develop new technologies. Mhm. Your 1980s racism needs an update.

https://theguardian.com/world/2023/mar/02/china-leading-us-in-technology-race-in-all-but-a-few-fields-thinktank-finds