• NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    6 hours ago

    There wasn’t really a Bernie-Trump pipeline in the first place.

    There was. Now this isn’t a massive election-deciding group, but it’s an interesting phenomenon that tells us a lot about the audience for progressive politics.

    • MountingSuspicion@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Direct quote from your link: “By every estimate, Obama-Trump—voters who had previously voted for Barack Obama but voted for Trump in 2016—vastly outnumber Sanders-to-Trump voters, accounting for about 14% of Trump’s total vote.”

      The X-Trump pipeline rhetoric is never brought up outside of sanders and does not take into account sanders took supporters from the GOP to begin with. It’s not shocking some people take inconsistent political action. What is shocking is that people are accepting the idea of there being a “pipeline”. It’s like when they write whole articles on 5 tweets and people eat it up. This is not a real concern and per your link Obama voters are more susceptible. It’s not a relevant point except that exciting candidates get a certain amount of people excited regardless of what side they are on.

      • NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 hours ago

        Sure, you’re not contradicting me.

        It’s not a relevant point except that exciting candidates get a certain amount of people excited regardless of what side they are on.

        No, it’s relevant because it means that progressive politics can mobilize current or future GOP supporters rather than just progressives.