hey@reddthat.com to me_irl@lemmy.worldEnglish · 4 months agome_irlreddthat.comvideomessage-square10linkfedilinkarrow-up1246arrow-down12
arrow-up1244arrow-down1videome_irlreddthat.comhey@reddthat.com to me_irl@lemmy.worldEnglish · 4 months agomessage-square10linkfedilink
minus-squaredylanmorgan@slrpnk.netlinkfedilinkarrow-up17arrow-down1·4 months agoExpensive watches are for men who can’t admit they want to wear a bracelet.
minus-squareccunning@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up3·4 months ago…and folks who can admit it but also want that bracelet to be an unnecessarily complex Rube Goldberg machine of gears and springs…
minus-squareUndergroundParking@lemmy.cafelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·4 months agoAren’t those things, at least in part, a way to carry lots of wealth on you quite conveniently?
minus-squarequalia@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·19 days agoPocket watches were standard for men for just this readon until WWI when wristwatch convenience helped coordinate timing more efficiently.
Expensive watches are for men who can’t admit they want to wear a bracelet.
…and folks who can admit it but also want that bracelet to be an unnecessarily complex Rube Goldberg machine of gears and springs…
Aren’t those things, at least in part, a way to carry lots of wealth on you quite conveniently?
Pocket watches were standard for men for just this readon until WWI when wristwatch convenience helped coordinate timing more efficiently.