• Charlie FishA
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    57
    ·
    23 days ago

    That is so bad. They clearly don’t understand the appeal of decentralized systems…

    • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      49
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      23 days ago

      At the same time people on here are defending the centralization of PC gaming on Steam so even fediverse users don’t understand decentralization

      • GoodEye8@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        30
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        23 days ago

        How do you imagine decentralized gaming? Every game comes with it’s own launcher?

            • deus@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              22 days ago

              My friend down the street had an LX back in '83. It was an amazing device but sadly way too ahead of its time.

        • ByteOnBikes@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          23 days ago

          My fantasy is that PC games become similar to roms, where it’s a single file. Maybe encoded is the system specs, OS, etc.

          Then the “emulator” just works.

          Of course, no financial incentives and a lot of work just to exist. Not to mention, it’ll be impossible to do for modern games. But maybe every game that’s older than 10 years old gets this treatment.

          Also I’m not a OS engineer and maybe this is what Proton is doing with Linux.

          Then pure decentralized gaming on any OS - computer, browser, raspberry pi, “smart Fridge”, whatever has the specs. And the game just works.

        • OhYeah@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          22 days ago

          The idea is for games to be launcher independent/compatible with many launchers. If I wanna play a game I got on gog I could use the official launcher, heroic, mini galaxy, or I could even use no launcher and just download the game installers directly

          • GoodEye8@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            22 days ago

            And how would a launcher identify you’ve actually purchased the game? You still need a central source for that. Hypothetically I guess there could be an activitypub like protocol that all storefronts could use to sync purchases, but that opens up a whole other can of worms, such as account linking, purchase duplications, refunds. The main questions with this hypothetical are

            • Why would stores implement this when they don’t really benefit from it?
            • Why would the users want it when it means creating more accounts and linking them? Why not just stick to one platform that best covers your needs? I guess there would be the “what if Valve turns bad?” argument, but company turning bad is at best a once in a decade situation. If that’s the only reason then the feature won’t be used 99.99% of the time.
            • There’s also a question of who pays for the data? Games are huge and the cost of keeping storing them is factored into the price of the game. However, if you buy from store A and download in store B how is store B supposed to stay afloat when they only eat the cost of storing the game.

            As for going completely launcherless, how do you solve updating the game? Steam was originally made to solve the patching problem, because each patch would effectively shut the entire game community down while everyone waited for everyone else to patch their game.

      • Duamerthrax@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        23 days ago

        I think people just prefer Steam to Epic or EA’s store fronts. Whenever GoG gets brought up, the only major complaint is is that there’s no official Linux launcher, even when there are Linux binaries for the games.

        • yessikg@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          23 days ago

          GOG’s Windows launcher is bad so it’s not really a big loss. Heroic Launcher is excellent and supports more than just GOG

          • Duamerthrax@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            22 days ago

            It’s not very good, but does the job. I mainly used the Mac version before jumping ship entirely. I was surprised that they made a Mac version, but no lINUX version. If you ever wanted to know true pain though, the Mac version of the Epic launch was true trash. Nothing worth playing on that anyway though since they discontinued Unreal Tournament.

            Heroic launch has been pretty good for any of the modern games I’ve tried it it. Eventually, I want to get some of the old Star Wars games running though.

    • SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      23 days ago

      The instance I’m on isn’t federated with every other instance. Why would you expect steam to effectively federate with every instance?

      • Charlie FishA
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        23 days ago

        What? I’m not following. Steam isn’t federating with anyone. This is about having a link to an external site. Nothing more. Has nothing to do with federation directly.