• southsamurai@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      64
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      I mean, I did say for a pope there.

      And it’s possible to be flawed and still have compassion. Should he have done better? Absolutely. But he was better than the pope before him, and the one before that, alllll the way back.

      It’s okay to recognize the good in a person while also recognising the bad.

      However, this is c/lemmybewholesome and it wouldn’t have been appropriate for me to bring up the bad in a top level comment.

      It’s fine in child comments, imo, but if a community is geared around things being uplifting and positive, a top level comment should stay focused on those things. It’s one of those things where if I have to say something that drags down the overall thread, I shouldn’t say it at all. So I focused on the good side of things.

      And, again, I did say that he was decent for a pope. I acknowledged that he had flaws indirectly in as friendly a way as possible by phrasing things that way

      • starlinguk@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        The previous pope was a Nazi, I can’t even remember the guy’s pope name, just his real name. Fuck Ratzinger.

          • dufkm@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 day ago

            I hope the next pope revives one of the classic pope names, there are so many good ones to choose from. Pelagius, Viligius, Damasus… I can’t take any more Pauls, Benedicts, Pius, Innocents, Clements etc.

            • qyron@sopuli.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              24 hours ago

              The last one broke ground with his name/title. I liked it.

              Wasn’t there a pope called Leo?