The Picard Maneuver@lemmy.worldM to Facepalm@lemmy.world · 3 months agoJob's done, boss.lemmy.worldexternal-linkmessage-square19fedilinkarrow-up1325arrow-down13
arrow-up1322arrow-down1external-linkJob's done, boss.lemmy.worldThe Picard Maneuver@lemmy.worldM to Facepalm@lemmy.world · 3 months agomessage-square19fedilink
minus-squarecandyman337@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up36arrow-down2·3 months agoI feel like it’s more likely that the door hinges got moved to the other side
minus-squareOnomatopoeia@lemmy.cafelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up17arrow-down1·3 months agoOr it was malicious compliance
minus-squareKhanzarate@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up9·3 months agoMaybe but if so it’s a shame, so someone still failed.
minus-square18107@aussie.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7·3 months agoThe numbers would go the wrong way if that was true. It would be 180 when closed and 0 when fully open.
minus-squarecandyman337@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up1·3 months agoI think they did that because we read left to right. It still gets the point across if you open the door then close it
I feel like it’s more likely that the door hinges got moved to the other side
Or it was malicious compliance
Maybe but if so it’s a shame, so someone still failed.
The numbers would go the wrong way if that was true. It would be 180 when closed and 0 when fully open.
I think they did that because we read left to right. It still gets the point across if you open the door then close it