Veteran 60 Minutes anchor Scott Pelley reported on Donald Trumpās efforts to strong-arm some of the countryās top law firms into doing his bidding on Sunday nightās episode of the embattled CBS newsmagazine.
Pelleyās segment pulled no punches in describing Trumpās efforts and reminding viewers that Trump is the āfirst felonā ever to sit in the Oval Office.
You think you make good points but you donāt.
And yet youāre the one who cancelled his comment. Pray tell, is it not true that the rise in American authoritarianism started in the late 60es, when the government started to act in spite of what public opinions thought about its action in foreign countries and wars? If not, can you please post any proof supporting this thesis of yours? Because itās sure as heāll that I, as many others, will never take your word for granted if you arenāt able to support it with factual information.
Take your head out if your ass and realise that American (like most of us in the ādevelopedā world) have been bought with pearls and trinkets to subdue their reasoning capabilities and voices to capitalism and its venomous fruits. The sooner you accept this ACTUAL FACT the sooner you can start fighting the good fight against capitalism and its cronies (who may also be your friends and family; not all capitalists drive around in nice cars or live in big villas. Most of them are āmomentarily embarrassed billionairesā or delusional victims as I like to call them)
Then your comment was such a load of shit that it was removed from a moderator. Either way the original comment we were replying to is no longer with us so I cannot tell the point you were arguing about in it, I inferred its contents from the first reply by NoneOfUrBusiness and the citations he provided with it.
Furthermore your reply to NoneOfUrBusiness answer to your original post was just a āno, youāre wrong and Iām rightā. Such a level of discussion, you must be a sage in your community. If your community is a kindergarden .
Lastly you can have opinions, too bad they are shit opinions not supported by facts