The two officials—Paul Perkins, an associate deputy attorney general, and Brian Nieves, a deputy chief of staff and senior policy counsel—were seeking access to the U.S. Copyright Office but were denied entry at around 9 a.m., sources who spoke on the condition of anonymity told The New York Times.

Despite Trump’s appointment of Blanche as acting librarian of Congress, library staff have reportedly been recognizing Robert Newlen as their interim replacement instead, according to The Times’ sources. Newlen was principal deputy librarian and Hayden’s second-in-command.

Staff seem to be waiting for direction from Congress, with Newlen additionally sending an email to employees saying he did not recognize Blanche’s appointment as valid, according to Politico.

  • ExtantHuman@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Not “New Bosses”. They have not been legally appointed to the position. They are intruders posing as officials to gain unlawful access

  • Miles O'Brien@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    47
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 hours ago

    I take issue with the title.

    The term “new MAGA bosses” says “these ARE their new bosses and the staff aren’t letting THEIR NEW BOSSES in”

    Ajent Ornj doesn’t have the authority to place these goons into the library of congress, therefore THEY ARE NOT BOSSES, new or otherwise. They are THUGS trying to break into a library after being told to leave, because they are there to ruin any positive thing there and burn half the contents. Figuratively or a literal bonfire, doesn’t matter.

    Suggested new title: LIBRARY OF CONGRESS STAFF TURN AWAY MAGA THUGS WHO CLAIM AUTHORITY WHERE NONE EXISTS

  • gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    170
    ·
    9 hours ago

    Wow, I didn’t have the Library of Congress pegged as the one government agency that would actually tell orangeboi et al to go fuck themselves. But I’m not disappointed that they are.

  • NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    61
    ·
    8 hours ago

    Why couldn’t other agencies do this? Almost none of the DOGE crap that’s been done has been legal. So why did anybody listen to them at all?

    • CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      39
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Library of Congress is not part of the executive branch so constitutionally speaking, they don’t have new bosses unless Congress says so.

      That being said, I could make the argument that DOGE is not a valid department and that all government employees should have resisted yet here we are.

      • 5C5C5C@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        20
        ·
        7 hours ago

        In many of those cases, the building/department security sided with DOGE and physically forced the government employees to comply. There wasn’t much they could do to resist without ending up assaulted and detained having accomplished nothing.

        My biggest fear over the next few years is how many people who have chosen a career in “enforcement” are just salivating at the chance to be part of Team Nazi.

        • supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          1 hour ago

          My biggest fear over the next few years is how many people who have chosen a career in “enforcement” are just salivating at the chance to be part of Team Nazi.

          In a lot of enforcement industries it is not really a venn diagram, just two circles with just the tiniessssst bit of offset between them.

        • anomnom@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          4 hours ago

          how many people who have chosen a career in “enforcement” are just salivating at the chance to be part of Team Nazi.

          If it’s less than 99% …

    • solsangraal@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      38
      ·
      8 hours ago

      librarians have been dealing with republicans trying to take full control of all libraries for many decades

    • pelespirit@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      8 hours ago

      There was one division that I saw go by that did, and was arrested. I’m guessing that they didn’t expect this from librarians.

  • mr_jawa@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    41
    ·
    edit-2
    8 hours ago

    Who could have guessed a group of educated intellectuals would know the laws? Also. These assclowns are not officials. They were never confirmed by congress.

      • stoy@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 hours ago

        In broad strokes it kinda works like this.

        In 1989 the Japanese government passed the Media Betterment Act to censor media that the Japanese government considered to be harmful to Japanese society, and allowed the Media Betterment Committee to act against organisations and individuals that are trying to exercise their rights under the Statement on Intellectual Freedom that went into effect in 1954 (amended in 1979).

        However local governments opposed the MBA/MBC and established armed anti-MBA defense forces to protect libraries from being raided by the MBC.

        The year is now 2019 and the story follows a young recruit into the anti-MBA defense forces as she battles to protect libraries from censorship.