Let’s say better late than never.

  • LarmyOfLone@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    edit-2
    21 days ago

    No, “cultural genocide” is not genocide. There is a pretty clear legal definition:

    … any of the following acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group, as such:

    (a) Killing members of the group; (b) Causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group; © Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part; (d) Imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group; (e) Forcibly transferring children of the group to another group.

    • technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      21 days ago

      It’s pretty hilarious how tankies suddenly start quibbling over definitions once China is mentioned.

      Where’s that definition from?

      • idiomaddict@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        20 days ago

        Raphael Lemkin, who first coined the term, defined genocide as “the destruction of a nation or of an ethnic group” by means such as “the disintegration of [its] political and social institutions, of [its] culturelanguage, national feelings, religion, and [its] economic existence”.[2]During the struggle to ratify the Genocide Convention, powerful countries restricted Lemkin’s definition to exclude their own actions from being classified as genocide,[3][4] ultimately limiting it to any of five “acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group”.[5] While there are many scholarly definitions of genocide,[6]almost all international bodies of law officially adjudicate the crime of genocide pursuant to the Genocide Convention.[7]

        From that wiki page, and I appreciate the just barely academically masked sass about why it’s such a narrow definition

        • LarmyOfLone@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          5 minutes ago

          So is regime change to bring about a liberal democratic government also considered cultural genocide? Like if I’m working against the Saudi monarchy and Wahhabi religious order of laws (which is their long term culture) am I guilty of genocide?

          Was the invasion of Iraq and Afghanistan cultural genocide? Is forced rendition or even “nation building” genocide? Guantanamo? Rendition?

          Are Starbucks and McDonalds guilty of genocide for spreading their “franchises” (Temples of a neoliberal globalist culture really) everywhere?

          Is the “culture war” against the institutional racism in the USA a cultural genocide? After all it’s a culture of racism… are the atheists really conducting a cultural genocide with their War on Christmas!? Oh God! Are we the baddies???

          If you’re in Finland, don’t deny any of this! It’s illegal now!

          PS: Sorry this is a late reply, and obviously it’s argued to absurdity.