• Feathercrown@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Hot take but anyone who refuses to rethink how things work during their lifetime causes changes to happen at the pace of 1 change per generation.

      Of course, in this case, the new thing really is inferior.

      • GaMEChld@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        42
        ·
        2 months ago

        I have no problem with change. But I do have a problem with Microsoft’s lack of QC or proper design methodology.

        • wesley@yall.theatl.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          18
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          Yeah if the settings panel had feature parity with control panel but with a better user experience nobody would mind but it’s less features AND a worse experience.

          I remember trying to change some mouse settings on windows 10 but they removed the ability to get to the old mouse options from the desktop. I drilled down through the settings app and eventually buried deep I found where it would let me open up that same old mouse settings modal to get to what I wanted to change. More clicks, more searching, and less features = poor user experience

          • Krauerking@lemy.lol
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            10
            ·
            2 months ago

            I really love how many of the buttons in settings either open an edge web page where Microsoft shrugs at you or just opens the control panel for you to actually get something done…

            But hey when I need to turn off transparency effects cause it’s making all my taskbar icons disappear every time I swap desktops the new settings page works great. Sometimes.

            God they needed actual competition. Or something.

      • foo@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 months ago

        I mean I use windows and Linux for home and work. I’m happy with a changing ecosystem. The control panel is, often, the best tool to get shit done on windows.

    • ByteOnBikes@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      17
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Ew. They should expand their skill set to using terminal/powershell.

      I’m not knocking on GUIs but I will call out “IT professionals” who ONLY know how to use GUIs.

      • Verat@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        2 months ago

        To be fair powershell is more recent and windows has always used the control panel for most configuration, they are kind of rug pulling everyone who learned to use it and there arent clear terminal alternatives, for instance, how do I calibrate a game controller’s axis with the terminal?

        • /home/pineapplelover@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          14
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          Hot take, not everything should be powershell or cli. Control panel is pretty straightforward and even I use it from time to time. Because trying to find stuff in Settings is a nightmare.

      • piccolo@ani.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        2 months ago

        The whole point of windows is the gui… otherwise i’d just stick with Debian.

      • WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 months ago

        Any time on Linux, but the windows shells are unusable. And configuration databases are much more convoluted things on windows than text files