• Jerkface (any/all)@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        4 days ago

        That’s exactly a security concern from a design point of view. Your desire to trivialize it doesn’t change its nature, access control is access control. That’s not what DNS is for and making it do that is going to cause everyone regret.

        • Sir_Kevin@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          30
          ·
          4 days ago

          You’re not wrong. But if I had to pick between blocking .xxx on my kid’s device or uploading a photo of my ID to various porn sites, I know which one I’m choosing.

          • Jerkface (any/all)@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            17
            ·
            edit-2
            4 days ago

            “I want people to accept a bogus solution so this will all just go away.” Okay? But surely you can appreciate that people are not likely to be moved by your bad faith suggestions.

            • मुक्त@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              3 days ago

              Access to .xxx domains can be mandated to require detection of parental controls, and needing proper age verification if they are not in use.

              Or I am missing some design problem here?