• doug@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    188
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    3 days ago

    Ok, but let’s not be divisive among generations over a common enemy.

    No war but class war.

    • k0e3@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      Exactly. As a millenial, my goal is to be compassionate for the next generation — not to pull the “when I was your age” card on Gen Z and Alpha.

    • lobut@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      30
      ·
      2 days ago

      Yup! I’m a millenial here and I’m not here to compete for the oppression Olympics.

      The rich just gave themselves another tax break. I’m not here to fight my fellow people. I want to eat the rich!

    • quetzaldilla@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      35
      ·
      2 days ago

      I hold nothing but compassion and solidarity for those who follow.

      I want things to be easier for them, not as hard or harder than they were for us.

      Story:

      Just had a really painful conversation with my Boomer in-laws. They refuse to see acknowledge how bad things are for us and blame us for our failure to thrive like they got to, after receiving a six-figure cash injection back in the 80s from their parents, which is all gone now with their frivolous spending.

      • brendansimms@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        26
        ·
        2 days ago

        In the US, 1950-1980 is the era of lowest wealth inequality in the countries history. The top tax rate reached 91% in that time period. It is currently around 37%. Us poors had it worse before then, and have it worse after then. They won a birth lottery. Source: Thomas Piketty’s ‘Capital in the 21st Century’

        • RowRowRowYourBot@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          22
          ·
          2 days ago

          Cutting the top tax rate in 1983 actually increased tax revenue. A 91% rate is too high and encourages tax avoidance and evasion

          • gadfly1999@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            19
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            And now that it’s lower the billionaires are happy to pay their fair share and society is better off for it. /s

          • brendansimms@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            10
            ·
            2 days ago

            Do you have a source for that? I found this source that is citing data from the congressional budget office. SOURCE (I followed the link and did confirm the numbers match). I made a quick plot so it was easier to see trends. Nothing stands out to me about 1983 - there’s a small dip and then a course correction back towards the upwards trajectory, but this data tells us nothin about wealth inequality. We can’t use total values because of inflation and such , probably have to use revenue as a %GDP or something but I’m too lazy too keep searching at the moment :) My immediate thought looking at the plot is this: If the total tax rev kept going up, and the top tax rate was cut, then the increased tax burden must have shifted to the poorer classes; I’d have to verify but it seems like a logical conclusion.

    • RowRowRowYourBot@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      2 days ago

      PEW abandoned generational studies because they aren’t useful. You have more in common with people your age +/- 5 years than you have with your generation

      • EndlessNightmare@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        2 days ago

        It’s because discrete generations aren’t a real thing.

        You summed it up best: same age give or take a few years. I’m an elder millennial and have more in common with the youngest gen X than with the youngest millennials.

    • socsa@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      I mean if gen Z men are a big fascist majority, when does it start being a class war?

      • doug@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        Doesn’t matter, no war but class war.

        The primary adjective/insult to focus on is them being a fascist; the moment you pull any other, non-related adjective into the insult, they give themselves permission to ignore you.

        Fuck fascist assholes, fuck the upper class, no matter the demographic.