• towerful@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    128
    ·
    4 days ago

    Yup.
    But in open source it CAN be noticed, by anyone determined enough to dig into its side effects.
    Proprietary software? You file a regression bug that startup takes 500ms longer, and it might get looked at.

    Also, backdoors that are discovered in open source software improve automated software auditing.

    • alaphic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      75
      ·
      4 days ago

      500ms longer, and it might get looked at.

      Why would you even lie to the poor fellow like that? 🤣 lol

    • jj4211@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 days ago

      Yeah, you open a bug like that in proprietary software and it will immediately get rationalized away as having no business case to address, likely with a person with zero direct development responsibility writing a bs explanation like the small impact was due to a number of architectural changes.

      Speaking as someone with years of exposure to business managed issue handling.

    • magic_lobster_party@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      4 days ago

      The flaw also highlighted a social engineering exploit. It’s not the first time some vulnerability has entered open source software due to social pressure on the maintainer. Notably EventStream exploit.

      This is difficult to account for. You can’t build automated tooling for social engineering exploits.