Lord Wiggle@lemmy.world to Not The Onion@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 days agoTherapy Chatbot Tells Recovering Addict to Have a Little Meth as a Treatfuturism.comexternal-linkmessage-square188fedilinkarrow-up1977arrow-down112
arrow-up1965arrow-down1external-linkTherapy Chatbot Tells Recovering Addict to Have a Little Meth as a Treatfuturism.comLord Wiggle@lemmy.world to Not The Onion@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 days agomessage-square188fedilink
minus-squareouthouseperilous@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·12 hours agoLike the first thing in a discussion like that is defining terms you want to work on. If you’re trying.
minus-squarewebghost0101@sopuli.xyzlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down1·12 hours agoSeriously, do you understand anything i am saying? Defining OUR terms is a strawman argument counter to my point. OUR definitions are NOT the established definitions which you can read on wikipedia Here those are: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intelligence I repeat in yet different words: My own definition of what intelligence is off topic. Trying to find a shared definition is off topic. It’s about you telling people they cannot use the word ai. Because it does not match your personal definition.
minus-squareouthouseperilous@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down1·12 hours agoOh. Okay then. Like i said; bye.
Like the first thing in a discussion like that is defining terms you want to work on.
If you’re trying.
Seriously, do you understand anything i am saying?
Defining OUR terms is a strawman argument counter to my point. OUR definitions are NOT the established definitions which you can read on wikipedia
Here those are: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intelligence
I repeat in yet different words: My own definition of what intelligence is off topic. Trying to find a shared definition is off topic.
It’s about you telling people they cannot use the word ai. Because it does not match your personal definition.
Oh. Okay then. Like i said; bye.