• markovs_gun@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    73
    ·
    1 day ago

    This is the whole crux of MAHA. Make health a completely personal choice by denying any external causes of disease and then when you completely cut any possible health assistance then that’s fine because health is a completely personal choice and responsibility and people should just try harder to he healthy

    • Aspharr@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      10 hours ago

      It’s “prosperity gospel” but for health instead of wealth. I’m healthy because I’m a good person and you’re not because you’re a bad person. It’s literally the same talking points too. Point at the minority of folks in a demographic who actually make genuinely bad decisions and apply that to the group as a whole.

    • atzanteol@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      32
      ·
      edit-2
      23 hours ago

      Didn’t forget the part where you get to blame people for their own illness! Being sick now becomes a moral failing because you didn’t do enough to stay healthy.

      • xorollo@leminal.space
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        11 hours ago

        Being sick is a moral failing just like being poor or being ugly. /S

        Btw, have y’all seen the mar-a-lago face? That one IS a personal choice. And WOW what a choice.

      • Revan343@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        20 hours ago

        Being sick now becomes a moral failing because you didn’t do enough to stay healthy

        But if you do try to stay healthy (e.g. wearing a mask and social distancing during cold and flu season) you’re a $insult_of_the_week