• NABDad@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    15 days ago

    I’m not going to argue that Taylor Swift doesn’t deserve to be on the billionaire list somewhere, but if you were only going to include 4, why would she make the cut?

    • PugJesus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      14 days ago

      Insofar as Swifties need to be reminded from time to time that their favorite billionaire is still a billionaire, with all the problems that entails, I support reminding them, but Swift being put up as some major public enemy lately is weird.

  • Jo Miran@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    15 days ago

    Three of those billionaires made their fortunes by stealing other’s work and exploiting other’s labor. I might dislike Taylor Swift’s music but it is her music and her work that made her a billionaire. When someone stole her work from under her, she re-recorded it from scratch and then put on the most profitable tour in history with each show being 3+ hours long.

    I’m not a Swifty, but I also don’t think she qualifies to join that evil as fuck trio.

    • Droggelbecher@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 days ago

      Not close to as evil as the others for sure. But there’s a lot of labor that goes into making music and into touring that she didn’t do herself. Does all her talent make it right that she makes thousands of times more money per hour of labor as all those others?

  • Tyfud@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    14 days ago

    I get that tswift is a billionaire, but she doesn’t belong in this meme.

    Quit trying to equate her to the oligarchs. She hasn’t demonstrated any of those tendencies.

        • WrenFeathers@lemmy.worldM
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          14 days ago

          The point isn’t to subject them to gradation, it’s to note the damages they all do in their different ways.

          Taylor isn’t exempt from being held responsible for her part just because she’s a nice person.

          • Xanis@lemmy.worldB
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            14 days ago

            I mean what is she supposed to do, take a riverboat to her next tour? She’s a direct result of a larger cultural fascination, not the problem itself.

            • WrenFeathers@lemmy.worldM
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              14 days ago

              There’s plenty she could do and tons of other acts throughout history that managed to do what she does with a smaller carbon footprint.

              “She has no choice!” is not an argument to defend what she does.

                • WrenFeathers@lemmy.worldM
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  14 days ago

                  Asking someone to reduce their carbon footprint isn’t asking for perfection. It’s simply asking them to participate.

                  And a blatant refusal to do so is what earned her her spot on this list.

                  I’m sure she’s a nice person- but being nice doesn’t excuse one from the responsibility of their actions.

      • Psythik@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        13 days ago

        She may single-handedly save America from turning into a fascist state with her endorsement, so she gets a pass for now. It is extremely important, yes, but we can worry about her carbon footprint after we get past this MAGA nightmare. Priorities.

        • Saleh@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          13 days ago

          Single handedly? So she is the one deciding the elections? I thought there is some 200 million voters deciding the elections. The fact that one billionaires endorsement is so decisive shows deep deep problems with the billionaire cult in the US.