Summary

Justice Samuel Alito, a self-described Originalist, has been criticized for allegedly disregarding the Constitutionā€™s text when it conflicts with his personal views.

Recently, it emerged that Alito accepted a knighthood from a European order, despite the Constitutionā€™s ban on foreign titles for U.S. officials.

This title, from the House of Bourbonā€“Two Sicilies, raises questions about Alitoā€™s commitment to American democratic ideals, which the Framers aimed to protect from foreign influence.

Critics argue that Alitoā€™s actions reflect hypocrisy in his supposed adherence to Originalism and constitutional principles.

  • Arghblarg@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    10
    Ā·
    edit-2
    9 hours ago

    No idea! I have wondered that myself. In fact why doesnā€™t he do it now, heā€™s the ultimate lame duck prez, thereā€™d be no consequences for him so he absolutely should a few days after the election ā€“ if he truly could (I donā€™t know enough about the details about how he could so do).

    If your question is not just rhetorical, I totally agree, 100%.

    In fact I wish heā€™d declare heā€™s dissolving SCOTUS completely, plus a few levels of courts below and appointing non-partisan judges across the board to clean house and reset the decades of theocratic-proto-fascists that appear to have infiltrated the system at all levels. He could, after all, do anything right? The SCOTUS ruled this summer that Presidents have ā€˜absolute immunityā€™, so why not? It would be the ultimate F*ck You to their corruption and would be a historically beautiful way to bow out.

    EDIT: Oh look, Iā€™m not the first to think of it

    • AutistoMephisto@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      Ā·
      6 hours ago

      I mean, he could, but wouldnā€™t he need Congress to confirm his appointments? Theyā€™d just do what they did while Obama was in office and block any motion for a vote, especially since the Democratic party doesnā€™t hold a filibuster-proof, 60-member Senate majority. Although, Obama had that and still blew it, the price of believing one can still engage in good faith negotiations with bad faith actors, Iā€™m afraid.

      Theyā€™re already declaring their intentions to not negotiate with Harris in good faith, should she win the election, and to block all Presidential appointments. Hopefully she will go ahead and do it anyway. SCOTUS does get the final say in what does and does not constitute an ā€œOfficial Actā€, but they donā€™t have any enforcement mechanism. All they can do is send a strongly-worded letter, asking her to stop, but they canā€™t force her to stop.

      • Rivalarrival@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        Ā·
        6 hours ago

        I mean, he could, but wouldnā€™t he need Congress to confirm his appointments?

        Just a simple majority in the Senate. And since he has absolute immunity, he can just order the executions of a sufficient number of Republican senators to ensure his appointments make it through confirmation.