• neidu3@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    ·
    3 days ago

    Ripping it to an ISO file is basically the “industry standard”. Something else I used to see when sailing the high seas back in the day is bin/cue pairs, but iso was by far the most prevalent. I have long since forgotten how this is done on windows, but on Linux it’s basically dd if=/dev/cdrom of=/home/studmuffin2000/somecd.iso

    • Em Adespoton@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      3 days ago

      Depends on the CD. If it’s just a data CD, iso is the way to go. If it’s a mixed mode CD with data plus audio, bin/cue will preserve the audio tracks but iso may not. Also, mixed Joliet/HFS CDs can lose one of the formats if imaged with an iso imager.

      The big thing is that you want to image the entire CD and not just the most recent track on the CD.

      • neidu3@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        3 days ago

        That makes sense - I never looked into why bin/cue was sometimes used. Would that mean that bin/cue is better for multitrack and mixed mode CDs?

        • Em Adespoton@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 days ago

          Yes, because it records “all” the data.

          Other image formats also store the extended data at the start of the disc and the gap data between the tracks, but unless it’s an odd format or has some really nasty copy protection, that information isn’t usually useful.