The reason this is so funny is that in Sovcit logic, “conveyance” is a term to invoke a “right to travel” that supposedly makes vehicle licensing and insurance requirements unconstitutional.
By saying he intends to live in one, he’s completely undoing that logic. He can’t even Sovcit properly.
Sea-going vessels don’t have restrictions on commercial use. Conveyances do. So, take your conveyance down to the boat ramp, position at least one wheel in the water to demonstrate it is a water-going vessel. Remove the “conveyance” placard, affix a “vessel” placard, and you now have a self-portaging vessel, free of the encumberences upon land vehicles and conveyances.
It’s not a car, it’s a conveyance.
The reason this is so funny is that in Sovcit logic, “conveyance” is a term to invoke a “right to travel” that supposedly makes vehicle licensing and insurance requirements unconstitutional.
By saying he intends to live in one, he’s completely undoing that logic. He can’t even Sovcit properly.
Buncha idiots.
Sea-going vessels don’t have restrictions on commercial use. Conveyances do. So, take your conveyance down to the boat ramp, position at least one wheel in the water to demonstrate it is a water-going vessel. Remove the “conveyance” placard, affix a “vessel” placard, and you now have a self-portaging vessel, free of the encumberences upon land vehicles and conveyances.