• birdwing@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    10 hours ago

    I oppose it, mainly because it takes advantage from gullible people, and opens the door for companies making water expensive.

    • ExtremeDullard@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      10 hours ago

      Food pedants aren’t gullible. They know full well water isn’t worth anything like the price it’s sold when it’s bottled. But they’re pedants: it’s their job to look sophisticated. They literally make a living out of talking bullcrap about food.

      That’s why I said: if they want to pay silly money for water, they’re welcome to. What I oppose if ordinary people listening to them and getting taken for a ride next time they go out for dinner.

      But I think reasonable people won’t fall for that one. It’s just too stupid on its face. And people who are too dumb to know water is just water, well… a fool and his money…

      • birdwing@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        10 hours ago

        But that’s the thing, grifters might earn a lot of money with the few gullible people, and then use their wealth for nefarious ends.

        I agree with you that some people are just too dumb, but in this age I’d prefer to not let grifters get any chance.