Summary
President Joe Bidenās economic achievementsālowering inflation, reducing gas prices, creating jobs, and boosting manufacturingāare largely unrecognized by the public, despite his successes.
His tenure saw landmark legislation like the Inflation Reduction Act, CHIPS Act, and major infrastructure investments.
However, Bidenās approval ratings remain low, attributed to inflation backlash, weak communication, and a media landscape prone to misinformation.
Democrats face a āpropaganda problemā rather than a policy failure, with many voters likely to credit incoming President Trump for Bidenās accomplishments due to partisan messaging and social media dynamics.
Exactly. Democrats think that if they just tell people positive metrics enough times, these feelings will go away. They wonāt. You have to look at them and say, āYouāre right, things still suck for you. Things got better for a lot of people, but people like you didnāt see much of that because of [X] and [Y]. Hereās how weāre going to fix it.ā Otherwise, theyāre going to listen to anyone who tells them their problem is real, even a racist xenophobe that blames migrants for everything.
I think to some extent, Kamala said exactly how she planned on making things better. Trump didnāt say anything, and as usual had no plans. He still got elected. I saw an article last week about Trump saying not saying what his plans were helped him. What sense does that make, when a guy like Trump, whoās never had a plan or a rational suggestion to anything (āletās nuke the hurricanes!ā), can not say a damn thing about what his policies would be and still get elected? That tells me the Dems were drastically out of touch.
Dem technocrats are drastically out of touch and donāt realize how much aggrivement towards the status quo and desire for change there really is. Trump doesnāt do policy and it doesnāt matter because the people donāt care about policy either. We live in turbulent times, and thereās a groundswell of support for a nebulous āchangeā. Trump positioned himself as anti-establishment, persecuted, and radical in a way that was appealing enough to retain his voter base. Meanwhile, Harrisā institutionalism, focus on incrementalist policy, and boring rhetoric failed to galvanize support.
Spot on. When times are bad (whether actually true, or simply perceived that way) it should come as no surprise that the people voted for a change. Trump is the embodiment of āanti-establishmentā. Progressives must take back the party from Neoliberals.
To some extent, yes, but it wasnāt the forefront of her campaign. She talked about greedflation and had a plan for price-capping groceries, but they should have been attacking this point from 2022, not the tail end of the campaign. She was far more focused on middle-class issues and an, āopportunity economy,ā than the dire financial conditions of the working class.