Summary

Rep. Daniel Goldman plans to introduce a resolution clarifying that the Constitution’s two-term limit for presidents applies even if terms are non-consecutive, aiming to close any perceived loophole after Donald Trump joked about seeking a third term.

While unlikely to advance under Republican Speaker Mike Johnson, Goldman’s resolution underscores Democrats’ concerns over Trump’s repeated comments about serving beyond two terms, which some view as ā€œanti-democratic and authoritarian.ā€

Goldman urges bipartisan support to uphold the 22nd Amendment, amid fears that some Republicans might not view Trump’s statements as mere jokes.

  • dhork@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    2
    Ā·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    The 14th amendment approach did have some legitimate issues with it. If it worked, then I am convinced Abbott would have invoked some bullshit ā€œBiden is creating an invasion at the borderā€ excuse to remove Biden from the ballot. That’s why the decision ended up unanimous.

    The 22nd amendment’s text is a whole lot clearer, and far less subject to interpretation. I can see a State saying ā€œI don’t even need the Supreme Court to weigh in on this oneā€. And if it does come up with some tortured logic, I can see a State telling it to go to hell, because the one thing it can’t focus do is rewrite the Constitution.