• hperrin@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    149
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    Ha! Get fucked, losers. Cheaters ruin the fun for everyone, so I hope every last one gets permabanned.

    • tequinhu@lemmy.world
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      33
      arrow-down
      91
      ·
      2 days ago

      You cannot permaban a cheater for the saame reason you shouldn’t have death penalty, people need to be able to challenge the decision which should trigger a process

      As a piece of software, I highly doubt there isn’t a single bug in VAC that would cause a false-positive

      • JustARaccoon@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        52
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        Bro touch grass. Seriously likening a VAC ban with the death penalty?! You can just email someone if you got banned; if you wrongfully died from the death penalty you can’t just phone the judge and ask him to recheck lmao

        • DupaCycki@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          24
          ·
          1 day ago

          Judges should be using ouija boards to communicate with people killed by death penalty. “So you were guilty, right?” To make sure everyone gets a chance to appeal the decision.

        • vocornflakes@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          17
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          2 days ago

          Consequence of sentencing the wrong person to death: You killed an innocent life in an irreversible action.

          Consequence of permabanning a player from an online game: The player can no longer play the game. The action is also reversible since “permaban” just means to say “we’re never unbanning you unless something extraordinary were to happen”.

        • Schadrach@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          1 day ago

          Meh, no process is perfect and sensitivity and specificity are often enemies. Basically, in a lot of cases the more sensitive you make a test to detect something, the more likely it is to accidentally catch false positives.

          Sounds like they’ve vastly improved it’s ability to detect, hopefully that didn’t come with false detections for people running unusual hardware or software combinations.

      • groet@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        63
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        When you suspect someone of being highly dangerous you put them in jail even if they are not convicted yet. And when it turns out they are innocent they are released.

        A ban is like jail not like a death sentence …

          • groet@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            1 day ago

            And you can contest the ban and potentially get it lifted and return to the same game.

        • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          Not a bad analogy, but there is a major problem with pre-trial detention being abused in the US, leaving people in jail for years at a time without having a trial. So maybe not the best thing to compare it to.

          • groet@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 day ago

            No, absolutely the best comparison because the same thing happens with bans and bad moderators who ignore requests and refuse to explain a ban.

      • Joelk111@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        22
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        If, to you, not being able to play one game in the sea of many many many games is akin to death, maybe you need to see someone about addiction.

        If you cheat in a game, you’ve burned your bridge. It’s like taking a piss in the cereal isle of Kmart, you probably won’t be welcome in that Kmart any more. Or hey, maybe you’ll end up like an acquaintance I knew who was banned from a Kmart, maybe you’ll be hired on as staff without them checking the binder of banned people. I think I’ve lost the plot of this analogy.

      • IronBird@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        41
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        shadowbanning to cheater-only servers sounds like nice middle ground to me

            • WorldsDumbestMan@lemmy.today
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              7 hours ago

              League of Legends was evil for this. I got shadowbanned to rhe quitters server for having a bad internet connection, and parents who’d demand I go buy groceries instantly, and yell if I fon’t.

        • Cybersteel@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 days ago

          Sometimes it’s a nice perk if you want to play modded coop with your friends ie those from mods.

      • skisnow@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        Yeah, I have a very thoroughly ingrained suspicion of people treating anticheat with too much confidence stemming back to when I got banned many years ago from an online game for supposedly running a script.

        I had so much lag on my dialup connection, that a backlog of all my commands hit their server at the same time, so from their perspective it looked like I’d entered over a dozen commands in under a second. Insta ban, no appeal, essentially lost access to a significant percentage of my online friends that it hadn’t occurred to me to get email addresses for.

      • hperrin@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        2 days ago

        I said cheaters, not suspected cheaters. I know that’s unrealistic, because no anticheat software is perfect, but I still want it.

      • xep@discuss.online
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        You surely can permaban a cheater, and should. It doesn’t mean the process can’t be challenged.

        • WorldsDumbestMan@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 hours ago

          It does not matter if they change. They violated the community’s trust, and should never be allowed to interact with that community again, if it is worth anything.

      • Matriks404@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        In the worst case scenario offender can just create another Steam account, so permaban is fine.