• brucethemoose@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    5 hours ago

    I used to “cheat” in Mass Effect 3 CooP, using cheat engine to buy those weapon/character crates en masse.

    Screw that grind. It was such a sublime MP game EA bolted the absolute stupidest loot box system to. Everyone in the platinum tiers did it; it didn’t hurt anyone’s experience. That game was so good everyone played for the sake of the game anyway, not the trickle of unlocks.


    As a side “cheat”, I used to host modded public lobbies with crazy mixes of enemies, like all banshees one wave or “ranger” swarms of scions+ravagers another and such. A few players left, but the most common reaction was “holy shit, this is mad” and players stayed for the fun.


    …I guess what I’m saying is, screw malicious cheaters.

    But I also don’t like the idea of locking out modding either, or enforcing particularly asinine P2P schemes. I suppose the kind of MP games even conducive to modding don’t really exist anymore though :(

  • dan69@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    6 hours ago

    I knew it that last cs2 game I was playing had a cheater… always losing every game I’ve played

  • arankays@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    14
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Does anyone have proof that this is less/more effective than kernel level anti cheat?

    Please provide factual evidence, not hearsay. That’s % cheaters detected vs % cheaters not detected scaled by the overall player base.

    • patatahooligan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Nobody can have proof of that, because no such proof can ever exist. How would you ever have a proven correct number of cheaters not detected?

      • arankays@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        11
        ·
        5 hours ago

        So what’s the point of an anti cheat then if you don’t know how many people are cheating, how many people are not, and you don’t have confidence that the anti cheat is 99% effective at the very least?

        • TheOakTree@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 hours ago

          It can be tested in closed systems but it’s not something you can easily define the success rate of because the cheats are constantly evolving and game updates close or introduce vulnerabilities.

          There is still value of having an anti-cheat even if it does not have a high chance of catching cheaters, so long as it keeps false positives to a minimum.

          • arankays@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 hour ago

            “there is still value of having an anti cheat even though it does not have a high chance of catch cheaters”

            That doesn’t make any sense. LOL. What’s the value then of the anti cheat?

      • arankays@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        5 hours ago

        Please provide proof that games with kernel level anti cheat have the same rate of cheating as games without it.

        • busyconstruction13@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          4 hours ago

          A game blocks cheats or it doesn’t. Only cheat providers and gaming companies will have those numbers and I’m not sure they are going to release them.

          • arankays@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            4 hours ago

            Thanks for letting me know. So we don’t have any proof at all that these anti cheats are effective? I’m not even saying which anti cheat. Just saying in general.

            • busyconstruction13@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              4 hours ago

              Depends on your definition of effective. Both are still certainly too much. I haven’t seen one that’s 100% effective.

              • arankays@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                3 hours ago

                What do you mean definition of effective lmfao. An anti cheat should stop cheaters. If I go on counter strike and I find a cheater then that anti cheat is ineffective. If I go on valorant and don’t find a cheater that is effective. It’s not that complicated.

  • billwashere@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    24 hours ago

    I don’t generally have a problem with anti-cheat mechanisms except when they require things like secure-boot or allowing me to do what I want with my machine.

    • Zeon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      They’re all proprietary, wouldn’t want that crap on my system anyway. (I don’t game anymore)

  • MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    55
    ·
    1 day ago

    I was blissfully unaware, probably because I’m not cheating scum.

    Couldn’t have happened to a better community of people.

    Fuck cheaters.

    IMO, cheating is just taking away all the fun of the game. The cheater didn’t have to get gud to be able to win, and the victim is denied any recourse or any fun in playing the game. Bluntly, I have absolutely no sympathy at all for these kinds of people. If you suck at the game and need to use cheats to win, maybe don’t fucking play it competitively?

    There’s a reason I’ve kept my counterstrike antics to private games among friends and local matches against bots. I have no interest in larder boards. I just want to have fun. Dying over and over before you can even do any damage, isn’t fun.

    If you’re a cheater, get wrecked.

    Bravo valve. Bravo.

    • Olhonestjim@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      19 hours ago

      I’ve only ever run macros for mining in a game I loved that had a terribly dreary, but almost necessary mining mechanic. They banned for macros though, so I stayed alert for approaching mods.

    • Eufalconimorph@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      22 hours ago

      I never cheat in multiplayer. But if a single-player game has a “hacking” minigame, I’m absolutely loading up Ghidra & GDB and figuring out how to actually hack around it. Pretty much always harder than just playing the minigame, but more fun.

      • Duamerthrax@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        8 hours ago

        oh god. When I played System Shock 2 for the first time, I couldn’t figure out how the hacking puzzles worked. I look up guides and asked for advice. Got told to gitgud by someone who didn’t play the game, then got told they were pure rng guided by the hacking stat. I saved scummed that shit. Don’t present me with something that looks like a puzzle, but isn’t.

    • Soup@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      22 hours ago

      Depending on who it is, and it’s obviously not even close to the vast majority of cheaters I’d imagine, there are people who cheat in tournaments and the like where they can win serious money, or people cheat so they can look good in front of viewers who pay them money. At that point there is both a practical reason for why they do it and also an excellent reason to get them to fuck all the way off because they’re not just cheating but are also theives.

      • inktvip@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        21 hours ago

        I’ve worked in esports for a bit and there’s definitely cheats out there that pros use. When utilised well you won’t even notice when directly spectating or when the player is streaming. They’re designed to help extremely good players just that little bit extra needed to become a top-tier player.

        Those “pro-grade” cheats don’t come cheap though. I’ve heard figures in the 400-600/month range multiple times. These would also work on the special tournament clients used by professional players.

    • boonhet@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      I used to cheat in GunZ online, but to be fair, I was like 11, the game wasn’t competitive, and leveling up for cooler gear and to unlock new maps was HARD work.

      Eventually I’d git semi gud and stopped bothering with the cheats. But it was fun as hell flying through the map with no clip, as a ball of fire that killed everything except other cheaters with godmode lmao

      • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        6 hours ago

        leveling up for cooler gear and to unlock new maps was HARD work.

        There’s something to be said for skipping unreasonable grind. It’s not okay to mess with other players experience, but that other part I do get.

      • MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        21
        ·
        1 day ago

        Woohoo to being responsible for others not having any fun playing a game!

        Woo! Woooooo.

        What?

        I don’t know why you would admit this.

          • boonhet@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            12
            ·
            1 day ago

            Yeah exactly, at that age knowing how to download cheats and stuff actually made you feel sorta cool, not everyone could figure it out (and I know most kids wanted to).

            Then realising it’s more fun without the cheats, just getting good at the game, I’d even dare call it a story of personal development.

            • Holytimes@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              6 hours ago

              This is the modern internet tho. You used cheats once 20 years ago as a child. Thus your shit for the rest of your life have no right to parole and deserve to be thrown in a hole?!!1!!1!1! /S

    • Auli@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      That’s what I don’t get cheating is rampant in online games but why? What fun is it to cheat I would think it takes the fin out of the game.

      • highball@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        24 hours ago

        and the victim is denied any recourse or any fun in playing the game

        That is how they get enjoyment from the game, denying other players.

        • WorldsDumbestMan@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 hours ago

          Those are the same type of people that cause damage in the economy by scamming others, leading to preventable deaths.

          Being caught cheating in a game, should leave you unemployable, with no welfare, and businesses should refuse to serve you.

          Just make a government black list.

  • Mwa@thelemmy.club
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    36
    ·
    1 day ago

    Finally, VAC is a good anticheat, and that works without running deep into the kernel.

    • KneeTitts@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 day ago

      Finally, VAC is a good anticheat, and that works without running deep into the kernel

      So this will solve the linux client not working because of crappy kernel level anti-cheat software?

      • Truscape@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        Not all games employ VAC, and it’s likely that a game that would employ it in the future would need to fine tune it for the game in question. (VACnet is reliant on curated data from game servers)

      • Mwa@thelemmy.club
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 day ago

        nah, am talking about Games with VAC being well known for not properly catching hackers, and i assume this made the anticheat in games better not the steam client itself.

  • PieMePlenty@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    57
    ·
    2 days ago

    I did finally win a match in CS2 after a long loss streak… it was definitely because everyone else was always cheating… not because I’m shit…

  • hperrin@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    149
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    Ha! Get fucked, losers. Cheaters ruin the fun for everyone, so I hope every last one gets permabanned.

    • tequinhu@lemmy.world
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      33
      arrow-down
      91
      ·
      2 days ago

      You cannot permaban a cheater for the saame reason you shouldn’t have death penalty, people need to be able to challenge the decision which should trigger a process

      As a piece of software, I highly doubt there isn’t a single bug in VAC that would cause a false-positive

      • JustARaccoon@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        52
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        Bro touch grass. Seriously likening a VAC ban with the death penalty?! You can just email someone if you got banned; if you wrongfully died from the death penalty you can’t just phone the judge and ask him to recheck lmao

        • DupaCycki@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          24
          ·
          1 day ago

          Judges should be using ouija boards to communicate with people killed by death penalty. “So you were guilty, right?” To make sure everyone gets a chance to appeal the decision.

        • vocornflakes@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          16
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          2 days ago

          Consequence of sentencing the wrong person to death: You killed an innocent life in an irreversible action.

          Consequence of permabanning a player from an online game: The player can no longer play the game. The action is also reversible since “permaban” just means to say “we’re never unbanning you unless something extraordinary were to happen”.

        • Schadrach@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          1 day ago

          Meh, no process is perfect and sensitivity and specificity are often enemies. Basically, in a lot of cases the more sensitive you make a test to detect something, the more likely it is to accidentally catch false positives.

          Sounds like they’ve vastly improved it’s ability to detect, hopefully that didn’t come with false detections for people running unusual hardware or software combinations.

      • groet@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        63
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        When you suspect someone of being highly dangerous you put them in jail even if they are not convicted yet. And when it turns out they are innocent they are released.

        A ban is like jail not like a death sentence …

          • groet@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            1 day ago

            And you can contest the ban and potentially get it lifted and return to the same game.

        • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          Not a bad analogy, but there is a major problem with pre-trial detention being abused in the US, leaving people in jail for years at a time without having a trial. So maybe not the best thing to compare it to.

          • groet@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 day ago

            No, absolutely the best comparison because the same thing happens with bans and bad moderators who ignore requests and refuse to explain a ban.

      • Joelk111@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        22
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        If, to you, not being able to play one game in the sea of many many many games is akin to death, maybe you need to see someone about addiction.

        If you cheat in a game, you’ve burned your bridge. It’s like taking a piss in the cereal isle of Kmart, you probably won’t be welcome in that Kmart any more. Or hey, maybe you’ll end up like an acquaintance I knew who was banned from a Kmart, maybe you’ll be hired on as staff without them checking the binder of banned people. I think I’ve lost the plot of this analogy.

      • IronBird@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        41
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        shadowbanning to cheater-only servers sounds like nice middle ground to me

            • WorldsDumbestMan@lemmy.today
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              7 hours ago

              League of Legends was evil for this. I got shadowbanned to rhe quitters server for having a bad internet connection, and parents who’d demand I go buy groceries instantly, and yell if I fon’t.

        • Cybersteel@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 days ago

          Sometimes it’s a nice perk if you want to play modded coop with your friends ie those from mods.

      • skisnow@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        Yeah, I have a very thoroughly ingrained suspicion of people treating anticheat with too much confidence stemming back to when I got banned many years ago from an online game for supposedly running a script.

        I had so much lag on my dialup connection, that a backlog of all my commands hit their server at the same time, so from their perspective it looked like I’d entered over a dozen commands in under a second. Insta ban, no appeal, essentially lost access to a significant percentage of my online friends that it hadn’t occurred to me to get email addresses for.

      • hperrin@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        2 days ago

        I said cheaters, not suspected cheaters. I know that’s unrealistic, because no anticheat software is perfect, but I still want it.

      • xep@discuss.online
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        You surely can permaban a cheater, and should. It doesn’t mean the process can’t be challenged.

        • WorldsDumbestMan@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 hours ago

          It does not matter if they change. They violated the community’s trust, and should never be allowed to interact with that community again, if it is worth anything.

      • Matriks404@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        In the worst case scenario offender can just create another Steam account, so permaban is fine.