• arankays@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 hours ago

    What do you mean definition of effective lmfao. An anti cheat should stop cheaters. If I go on counter strike and I find a cheater then that anti cheat is ineffective. If I go on valorant and don’t find a cheater that is effective. It’s not that complicated.

      • arankays@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 hours ago

        Can you please provide evidence that valorant has more or less cheaters than CS2, scaled by player base. Hearsay and personal experience aren’t facts. I personally have not encountered more than 1 cheater in valorant whereas with other games without kernel level anti cheat, every other lobby has one.

        • busyconstruction13@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 hour ago

          By your definition, anti cheat stops cheaters or it doesn’t lmfao what does other games have to do with it? Can you provide sources that valorant only has 1 cheater?

          • arankays@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            42 minutes ago

            I asked you to provide evidence of the rampant cheating problem in valorant as compared to games without kernel level anti cheat. The theory being, if valorant has less cheaters than let’s say, CS, that means a kernel level anti cheat is more effective than VAC at deterring cheating.

            Of course that’s just a theory. No one has evidence for anything 🙂