• pack@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    13 hours ago

    I have mixed feelings on this. Multiple family members worked in public schools, and a lot of kids want garbage processed foods. They know and like fruit loops and gold fish. They also like tomatoes and fresh fruit sometimes, but sometimes they just want comfort foods. I fully support healthy options and funding school lunches to the point they are delicious and nutritious, but you gotta meet some of these kids where they are, not where you want them to be.

    • sga@piefed.socialM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 minutes ago

      i get your line of thought, but i think schools and public infra in general should promote public well being over potentially making them slightly happier. As i see, it is similar to schools having mandatory sports for all, which promotes health. many students want to be lazy, but it does not harm them in general to do exercise

    • vividspecter@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 hours ago

      Another point to add is that the definition of upf is extremely broad and vague. And there isn’t much evidence that this whole category is harmful because of how broad it is. But hey, maybe it will still result in healthier meals overall nevertheless.