• Trevita17@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    It won’t get that far. DC grand juries are refusing to indict for these trumped up charges.

      • Trevita17@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        Never seen a job application with that on it. “Have you ever been convicted of a felony?” Sure, but never what you said.

          • Trevita17@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 day ago

            It apparently varies from state to state if, and when, they can ask that question. It’s also worth pointing out that any lawyer worth their salt (like the lawyers who work on behalf of the ACLU) would take steps to see that record erased or limited in how it can be used.

            And unless you are completely desperate, why would you work for someone who looks down on you for being arrested for standing up to fascists? Being arrested for that is a badge of honor.

            • logicbomb@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 day ago

              Still, an employer might have two applicants who they otherwise have a hard time selecting between, but one has been arrested and one hasn’t. They will probably choose the one who hasn’t been arrested. I would say that’s the bias against somebody who has been arrested is the whole point of asking the question.

            • logicbomb@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              24 hours ago

              By the way, Trevita17, I can see that you downvoted my other comment. Did you do this in retaliation, thinking that I had downvoted your comment? I didn’t, and you can see that with this link, which is the same service I used to see your downvote. I don’t approve of using downvotes like this. Comment downvotes should be reserved for trolls, spam, and serious misinformation.

              https://lemvotes.org/comment/lemmy.world/comment/19467935

              • Trevita17@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                24 hours ago

                Why would your approval factor into my behavior at all? I’ll remove the downvote, but get your ego in check.

                • logicbomb@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  23 hours ago

                  I was hoping to get buy in about the uses of downvotes.

                  I think that if people know that comment downvotes are public information and if they agree on the proper use of downvotes, we will be able to identify bad actors.

                  On the other hand, if people believe incorrectly comment downvotes have been unethically used against them, then anybody, even me, may let their demons get the better of them, and vote in revenge. So it’s very important for people to know it’s public information.

                  • Trevita17@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    3
                    ·
                    23 hours ago

                    Fake internet points are not worth this much deliberation. There are so many actual problems in this world you could be worried about, and you’ve chosen this. Make a different choice, a more impactful choice. You clearly have a good head on your shoulders, if a bit swollen. You should put it to good use.