• missfrizzle@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    15
    ·
    16 hours ago

    iPhones are highly regarded for security precisely because you don’t have to trust that Apple won’t hand over your data - it’s encrypted, if you set it up that way. enable Lockdown Mode, don’t use any services that aren’t E2EE. they can still try to GrayKey your phone, but it’s not Apple’s doing - GrayKey uses exploit chains which Apple legitimately does well to mitigate.

    GrapheneOS is better for security than iPhones, but less noob-friendly. there are guides, though.

      • missfrizzle@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        9 hours ago

        I’d trust an iPhone more than a random Samsung full of carrier bloatware, but I trust my Pixel running GrapheneOS more than either.

        I have the USB-C port disabled for anything but charging, a duress pin, and reboots after 8 hours without a login. I’m honestly not sure if GrayKey could unlock it. I have memory tagging and a bunch of other hardening enabled, running only open-source apps I’ve verified the signatures of, running with minimal permissions. It would be hard to hack.

        Yes, of course the NSA could almost certainly break it, but it would probably cost them time, money and vulns. If everyone uses GOS it will make their job very, very annoying :)

      • missfrizzle@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        15 hours ago

        nope, neither of your sources says they can decrypt your content. in particular, from your first:

        Data transmitted to Google and Apple includes metadata “detailing which app received a notification and when, as well as the phone and associated Apple or Google account to which that notification was intended to be delivered,” Wyden wrote. Sometimes data shared may include “unencrypted content, which could range from backend directives for the app to the actual text displayed to a user in an app notification,” Wyden warned.

        as for your second, that’s for unencrypted iCloud backups. you have to turn Advanced Data Protection on: https://www.macworld.com/article/2606947/icloud-encryption-how-secure-is-your-data.html

        note that iCloud Calendar, Contacts and Mail can’t be e2e encrypted, for fundamental reasons (notifications, discovery, SMTP.) but you don’t have to use those.

        • teawrecks@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          10 hours ago

          They have root access on your phone and it doesn’t function without constantly connecting to apple severs for every little thing. If Apple wants access to your data, they’re gonna get access.

        • WhatTheDuck@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          13 hours ago

          I know you mean the best, but an iPhone isn’t any better privacy-wise than an Android is. Regardless of their public stance, these giant monoliths have proven time and time again there’s no respect for an individual’s privacy. If they get caught lying/breaking the law, the fine is merely the cost of doing business.

          It would be better to focus on universal ways someone could keep themselves safe. Drop WhatsApp/SMS for Signal, drop Chromium based browsers, use uBlock, a VPN, etc. Arguing over phones is just infighting and not worth the energy.

          • missfrizzle@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            9 hours ago

            I disagree on dropping Chromium-based browsers. drop Chrome/Edge/etc. certainly, but Firefox is kept alive by a skeleton crew at this point, and almost certainly has more vulnerabilities than Chromium browsers. the sandboxing and process isolation, the defense in depth, it just isn’t there.

            I use Vanadium, which has all telemetry disabled, JIT off by default, and blocks ads.

            • ganryuu@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              45 minutes ago

              almost certainly has more vulnerabilities than Chromium browsers

              Unless you have real world data that confirms it, this is just fear mongering.

        • kaidenshi@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          14 hours ago

          I will never understand why anyone trusts a corporation who has proven time and again to spy on their own users and report back to the government, even before Trump was on the scene. I guess Cypher was right, ignorance is bliss.

          • missfrizzle@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            9 hours ago

            I don’t trust corporations. I trust math, and code, and systems design. I trust AES-256, even though the NSA picked it, because 20 years of cryptography research has revealed nothing close to a break. I trust SELinux, even though NSA invented it, because hundreds of kernel devs from around the world have audited it and touch that code regularly. I trust even proprietary systems which have been extensively independently audited and reverse engineered by security researchers, though I do trust them less.