• limer@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      2 days ago

      I did twice, let’s discuss it. Can you pick a paragraph that particularly upsets you and explain why it’s wrong ?

      • Hemuphone@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        14
        ·
        2 days ago

        I read it again just for the sake of discussion. Again, I am not upset. :D There is just not a lot to talk about.

        Only takeaway I got from this is that liberals suck according to the author. Cool, I guess they do. Or at least the very wide and constantly changing group being referred as “liberals” sucks.

              • Hemuphone@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                9
                ·
                2 days ago

                What’s with the name calling? Rude. Maybe you got some insights on the article since you think I did not read it when in fact I’ve read it multiple fucking times and the contents just won’t change :D

                • Amnesigenic@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  10
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  2 days ago

                  My insight into the article is it’s 100% accurate, you’ve had it explained to you in detail by several other users already here and you know it and you’re playing dumb because you don’t have an argument to make, the name calling is entirely warranted, cry about it

                  • Hemuphone@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    8
                    ·
                    2 days ago

                    What insight? All you do is insult me and claim I have not read the article. Only thing I’ve gathered from the conversations here is that people have very different meanings for the word “liberal”.

                    I truly think it’s you who is playing dumb and has no arguments to make. That’s why you resort to insulting me.

            • limer@lemmy.mlOP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              13
              ·
              2 days ago

              In fact, liberals do not even substantially disagree with the core of Trump’s policies. After all, both right-wing and liberal elites are loyal servants of empire, the latter just give it a veneer of humanitarianism.

              This is low hanging fruit, you did not even try. I can imagine many arguments you could make how liberals fundamentally disagree with some policies.

              But you would be hard pressed to refute the follow up paragraph

              Both support policies that sustain the oppression of poor and marginalised people: the corporatisation of healthcare and education, labour exploitation, mass incarceration, militarised policing, censorship, corruption through corporate donations, and extractivism and militarism abroad. The liberals have put their spin on all these with talk about human rights, rule of law, and diversity.

              And I think you literally have no valid counterpoints, for this op ed piece, as a whole. Or else you would have shattered me with your logic.

              I accept your concession.

              • Hemuphone@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                10
                ·
                2 days ago

                Who is this liberal group who does not disagree with trump? This grouping of people and ideologies is insane. Are people who agree with trump now also liberals? Is satan liberal?

                The article makes no real points, so dunno what there is to counterpoint? This magical group of “liberals” is evil and bad and fails at everything. The group changes paragraph to paragraph. Maybe they mean to say democrats? Or democrat votera? Or americans? Or the west? Or jews?

                Or they have defined “liberal” to mean some evil western leadership who has meaningful power but chooses not to use it because they actually agree with the way shit is going down.

                Maybe those liberals are evil. But it’s a non-opinion. Evil people are evil!

                • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  9
                  ·
                  1 day ago

                  Yes, conservatives are a subset of liberals. What we think of as “liberals” in the US is really a narrow category of the DNC’s policy positions, but both the GOP and DNC are liberal parties supporting capitalism and demonizing socialism.

                • bufalo1973@piefed.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  9
                  ·
                  2 days ago

                  Liberal in the non-US world is center-right at best. Full right at worst. The Dems outside the US are seen as center-right in some points and right in others.

                  • Hemuphone@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    7
                    ·
                    2 days ago

                    I guess it comes down to semantics. I don’t view the word liberal to mean right-leaning, but I guess it depends on your world view and where you come from.

                • limer@lemmy.mlOP
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  9
                  ·
                  2 days ago

                  I think one needs to define liberal here; as noted elsewhere what is one persons liberal is not seen as liberal by others. Especially when reading an essay in a non American paper.