This Hamas official has said a couple of interesting things:

  1. He doesn’t want Sir Tony Blair (former UK prime minister) involved in the governance of Gaza, despite Trump’s plan for the region proposing this.
  2. Hamas doesn’t plan to disarm, unless they are giving their weapons to a future Palestinian army.

Quote about the first point:

“When it comes to Tony Blair, unfortunately, we Palestinians, Arabs and Muslims and maybe others around the world have bad memories of him… We can still remember his role in killing, causing thousands or millions of deaths to innocent civilians in Afghanistan and Iraq… We can still remember him very well after destroying Iraq and Afghanistan.”

Quote about the second point:

Dr Naim said Hamas would not completely disarm and that weapons would only be handed over to the Palestinian state, with fighters integrated into the Palestinian National Army… “No one has the right to deny us the right to resist the occupation of armies,” he said.

Thoughts on this?

  • tal@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    22 hours ago

    Frankly, I suspect that there’s probably plenty of back-door wheeling and dealing, but if you take Naim’s rationale at face value, that he’s just after someone friendly to Muslims — which I probably wouldn’t:

    https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2025/03/27/pete-hegseth-tattoo-kafir/82696572007/

    Photos show that Hegseth has the word “kafir” tattooed in Arabic below his right bicep. The phrase is used in the Quran to refer to someone who has “disbelief” or “a rejection of true belief,” according to Islamic Scholar Abdullah Al Andalusi.

    The phrase appears alongside a tattoo reading “Deus Vult,” a phrase attributed as a rallying cry of the First Crusade.

    That’s not to mention his Jerusalem Cross tattoo.

    I wouldn’t especially call the Trump administration a great choice to be dealing with if the metric is regard for Muslims.