• thepompe@ttrpg.network
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    30
    ·
    7 hours ago

    I’m sorry, what? Gold has value regardless of if there’s a government backing it or not. That’s the entire point of investing in it, as a buffer for when fiat loses its value.

    • ranzispa@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      3 hours ago

      The value of gold lies in the fact that other men may be disposed to work their ass off in order to have some shiny things to gift to women in order to have sex. As you can imagine, the power of gold amongst married couples drastically decreases.

      Besides this… History shows humans always gave value to gold. For some reason we got very used into associating gold with value. As such, it is probably something good to have if economy collapses. But it doesn’t really matter if society collapsed.

      • Someonelol@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        3 hours ago

        Gold is supposed to represent something finite that’s hard to dig out of the ground. It’s like the antithesis of fiat currency that way. i think of it like a hedge against the dollar like with some cryptos. That said I only think US civilization would collapse while the rest of the world moves on or divvies up its corpse.

        • ranzispa@mander.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          3 hours ago

          That is valid for many other resources: iron, silicon, carbon, carrots whatever. Gold has always been attributed some special value, throughout history. That is ok. I don’t think US civilization is going to collapse, why would you think that?

          • Someonelol@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            2 hours ago

            The very article linked to this post talks about civilizational collapse of the US similar to the Roman republic.

            Turchin doesn’t track gold but he does track political and societal instability. He believes America has entered what he calls a “revolutionary situation,” where long-running systemic stress can no longer be contained. “It’s not a prophecy,” he said. “It’s modeling feedback loops that repeat with alarming regularity.”

      • Halcyon@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 hours ago

        Jup, many drugs have a market price similar to gold, so better invest into that, they can always be sold…

        (Di$claimer: The information provided is for general informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice or advising on drug trafficking. No guarantee is given regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content. Any investment decisions are made at your own risk. The author assumes no liability for financial losses or other damages resulting from the use of this information.)

    • SpongyAneurysm@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      43
      ·
      5 hours ago

      That’s the general idea, yeah. But gold investments are just a kind of construct where you legally own a certain amount of gold. Wether anyone respects your right of ownership when civilization collapses… we’ll see about that.

      • thepompe@ttrpg.network
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        26
        ·
        5 hours ago

        Now this guy has a much better idea of what’s going on.

        The rest of you are kinda stupid and that also explains why you just try to fit in with the crowd.

    • Rob Bos@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      30
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      7 hours ago

      What value? Can’t eat it, makes shitty tools. It’s shiny, but I’m not going to trade ny potatoes for shiny in a survival situation.

      You can starve sitting on a pile of gold.

      For gold to be valuable you still need social stability.

      • Danquebec@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 hours ago

        It’s more for when things have settled down a bit. Imagine you’re leading a group of people who secured a good territory and you’re growing more potatoes than you need. You may want jewelry made of gold to show how powerful and prosperous you are, both to your followers and to those outside. And you can give gold to particularily important followers, and to other leaders, in a very public ceremony, to show everyone that those leaders are beneath you.

        • Rob Bos@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 hour ago

          Totally. I was more commenting on the theory of gold having this magical inherent objective value. Which it doesn’t, it’s a commodity like any other.

          Honestly as a value store, land is probably better.

    • Legianus@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      7 hours ago

      He means regular money would be worthless as well as stocks and such. And as rich people own gold, but own much more of the other, he argues they would like to avoid collapse.

      However, I don’t think they really can. Also, if it comes to recession very rich people tend to profit.