• deadcream@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    22 hours ago

    Well the usual response to this is that people who don’t want to be in position of power would do a shit job at it (to the point of being net negative).

    Most people don’t want “bear the responsibility”, they want someone else to do it.

    • Victor@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      22 hours ago

      I say let’s have a system whereby if the ruler(s) do a good job according to the wide public, they are rewarded accordingly with taxes. If they do a shit job, they are rewarded with nothing. This way, we get politicians working for us rather than for themselves. I mean it would be also for themselves, but any net gain for them would be forced out of altruism. This way, you would aspire to be a hero if you could manage. And if you weren’t fit to rule, you’d resign very quickly because it would be a waste of your time to gain nothing.

      Any holes to poke through this? 👂🔥 All ears! Let’s build a better system!

      • Victor@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        10 hours ago

        I guess one hole I could poke myself is it the wide public wanted anarchy and war and garbage like that. But we’d have to establish some ground rules to begin with, like the stuff that protects humans and human rights. Those cannot be taken away. Damn. I had a sleep and this became harder than I thought.