Cool, cool cool cool. Nothing dystopian about that at all.

  • sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    And this was always the problem of building the panopticon, everyone justified doing it by saying ‘well, its fine so long as the good guys are in charge’, and ‘we have to stop the terrorists, 9/11 Never Again’.

    This is why the panopticon system is destroyed by Lucius Fox after using it to find the Joker in the Dark Knight.

    The system itself is too dangerous to be allowed to exist in a world of flawed humans, and it will eventually be wielded by those least morally qualified to wield it.

    Fuck, this is also basically analagous to the Lord of the Rings… Frodo is the hero for destroying the One Ring, not wielding it, because it literally corrupts you with its literally evil power.

    God damnit.

    • NewSocialWhoDis@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      4 days ago

      This “too dangerous to exist” argument is seemingly more true for nuclear technology, but the world recognized the threat and came together to manage it.

      I will grant you that database and ability to search it lends itself easily to popular oppression, but it still requires thinking, breathing humans to do the oppressing.

      Most technology is not dangerous without psychopaths in power, and damn near everything is dangerous with psychopaths in power.