Insider knowledge says he has been planning this a while to get back at his opponents and have something so large no one will be able to ignore it.
Donald gets off on people thinking about him, no matter if it’s negative or positive. By building this HUGE, UGLY, ILLEGAL ballroom, he is showing his opponents his legacy will be remembered forever.
I say we demolish that shit ASAP as soon as he dies so we can get rid of any changes he made to the PEOPLES HOUSE.
Aw fuck, I didn’t even think about that. So when he’s out of there, it’ll get rebuilt at taxpayer expense again. Meanwhile, you know it’s going to be gaudy trash.
People’s House? You mean the Presidential Palace, right?
I mean, it’s kind of funny how many purported leftists are grieving the destruction of a building that has been, for my entire lifetime, a metonym for war, bigotry, and oppression. The place where the most powerful men in the world smugly claimed to be “for the people” while looting the wealth of poor Americans to buy bombs to drop on poor foreigners.
Any building that hosted Henry fucking Kissinger as an honored guest deserves to be torn down.
Fuck the White House. Let Trump pave it over, claim the square mile surrounding it by eminent domain, and build a four million square foot presidential palace like Dubai’s. At least then the appearance would honestly match the reality.
Even if you feel that the white house should stop being used as an active part of the USA government, it doesn’t make sense to tear it down.
Take Auschwitz for example - a horrible place, but worth preserving so that future generations can see history in person and learn from the past. At the very least, the whitehouse is worth preserving for its historical value, if nothing else.
Take Auschwitz for example - a horrible place, but worth preserving so that future generations can see history in person and learn from the past.
I understand your argument, and I see the merit in it, but I deeply disagree. Some history doesn’t deserve to be preserved. We can learn from the worst of our past - we can celebrate the lives of the Nazis’ victims, mourn their deaths, and learn about the evil that killed them and the apathy and bigotry that enabled it - without turning genocide into a tourist attraction.
They paved over Hitler’s bunker and put a parking lot on top of it. A much more fitting end.
Auschwitz became a museum because Auschwitz survivors made sure it was. Survivors fought to preserve it and created what we see today. Otherwise it would long have been paved. It’s a place to remember the victims but also the atrocities commited there.
It’s not so much a tourist attraction, rather a monument to warn about fascism. It’s very different to visit than to just read about it in a book. Also, it’s not for-profit. It’s publicly funded.
Insider knowledge says he has been planning this a while to get back at his opponents and have something so large no one will be able to ignore it.
Donald gets off on people thinking about him, no matter if it’s negative or positive. By building this HUGE, UGLY, ILLEGAL ballroom, he is showing his opponents his legacy will be remembered forever.
I say we demolish that shit ASAP as soon as he dies so we can get rid of any changes he made to the PEOPLES HOUSE.
Aw fuck, I didn’t even think about that. So when he’s out of there, it’ll get rebuilt at taxpayer expense again. Meanwhile, you know it’s going to be gaudy trash.
People’s House? You mean the Presidential Palace, right?
I mean, it’s kind of funny how many purported leftists are grieving the destruction of a building that has been, for my entire lifetime, a metonym for war, bigotry, and oppression. The place where the most powerful men in the world smugly claimed to be “for the people” while looting the wealth of poor Americans to buy bombs to drop on poor foreigners.
Any building that hosted Henry fucking Kissinger as an honored guest deserves to be torn down.
Fuck the White House. Let Trump pave it over, claim the square mile surrounding it by eminent domain, and build a four million square foot presidential palace like Dubai’s. At least then the appearance would honestly match the reality.
Even if you feel that the white house should stop being used as an active part of the USA government, it doesn’t make sense to tear it down.
Take Auschwitz for example - a horrible place, but worth preserving so that future generations can see history in person and learn from the past. At the very least, the whitehouse is worth preserving for its historical value, if nothing else.
I understand your argument, and I see the merit in it, but I deeply disagree. Some history doesn’t deserve to be preserved. We can learn from the worst of our past - we can celebrate the lives of the Nazis’ victims, mourn their deaths, and learn about the evil that killed them and the apathy and bigotry that enabled it - without turning genocide into a tourist attraction.
They paved over Hitler’s bunker and put a parking lot on top of it. A much more fitting end.
Auschwitz became a museum because Auschwitz survivors made sure it was. Survivors fought to preserve it and created what we see today. Otherwise it would long have been paved. It’s a place to remember the victims but also the atrocities commited there.
It’s not so much a tourist attraction, rather a monument to warn about fascism. It’s very different to visit than to just read about it in a book. Also, it’s not for-profit. It’s publicly funded.
The parking lot was built specifically to keep Nazis from having a place of worship
I honestly cannot wait until this sack of shit is dead