• LordMayor@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    Right, for the average person, protein supplements are unnecessary as long as they are healthy and eat well.

    Athletes (and people with body dysmorphia 😬) might struggle to get enough protein in their diet. But, far too many people think they’re in a position that would warrant supplements when just a little attention to diet is sufficient.

    • Lizardking13@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 hour ago

      There are many other reasons to take protein supplements. High protein foods can be expensive (protein can be too but there are many options). It’s also a quick add to a meal vs prepping an entire meal.

      You don’t need to be an athlete to workout 5 days a week and if you want to visually see some of the results protein supplements help. It can also help with recovery whether you’re strength, training or training your body in any other way. You don’t have to be an athlete to want to be physically fit. Protein can help.

    • Victor@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      19 hours ago

      Were these subjects athletes or were they just people who were weight training?

      • LordMayor@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        18 hours ago

        Doesn’t matter. The point of the research was to determine if there was a difference between animal and plant based protein supplements for adding muscle. The results would apply to anyone.

        • Victor@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          10 hours ago

          And if neither has much effect, the study is pointless.

          I hope there was a control group who had a placebo supplement.

          • LordMayor@piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            4 hours ago

            That’s not how science works. You do experiments even to find out if it is pointless.

            But, yes, they should have a control group.

            • Lifter@discuss.tchncs.de
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              8 minutes ago

              So the research was pointless because we can’t tell the difference without a control group. Further research needed.