Transcription

A Twitter post by Kylie Cunningham @kyyylieeeee that reads “today at the airport one of the drug dogs set off a false alarm and officers rushed over to find out the dog had alerted them for a piece of pizza. the handler just patted his head and goes “it’s okay buddy i know pizza always confuses you” and gave him his treat anyways.”

  • ayyy@sh.itjust.worksEnglish
    12·
    1 day ago

    I…gave you a peer reviewed study? So have a few others. You’ve got some reading to do today, but I doubt you will.

    • 14th_cylon@lemmy.zipEnglish
      21·
      1 day ago

      I…gave you a peer reviewed study?

      you… you did not. i am talking about the statement i replied to.

      HERE IT IS:

      We’re talking about cops, not professionals. The dog’s job is to watch the cop handler and bark when they indicate, but not be too obvious about it.

      why are you trying to steer the discussion away from it? and - bonus question - do you think it will work? 😂

      • ayyy@sh.itjust.worksEnglish
        12·
        1 day ago

        Did you read everything humanspiral sent you? They’re nice easily digestible articles since you seem to be intimidated by whitepapers.

        • 14th_cylon@lemmy.zipEnglish
          21·
          1 day ago

          so you have no answer to this:

          We’re talking about cops, not professionals. The dog’s job is to watch the cop handler and bark when they indicate, but not be too obvious about it.

          well, maybe don’t say stupid shit next time. for now you can fly away and tell the other pigeons you won.

            • 14th_cylon@lemmy.zipEnglish
              22·
              1 day ago

              Did you read any of the linked studies?

              did you answer this?

              We’re talking about cops, not professionals. The dog’s job is to watch the cop handler and bark when they indicate, but not be too obvious about it.

              • ayyy@sh.itjust.worksEnglish
                1·
                1 day ago

                I guess I reeeeeeally have to hold your hand since you’re too busy master debating to scroll a few inches up and down on this same page. Why should I send you even more studies that you won’t read? You haven’t even read the ones you’ve already been spoon-fed. Yes, these links address my exact statement. You would know that if you read any of them.

                https://lemmy.world/comment/20293009

                https://lemmy.world/comment/20293055

                https://lemmy.world/comment/20293204

                • 14th_cylon@lemmy.zipEnglish
                  1·
                  24 hours ago

                  Yes, these links address my exact statement. You would know that if you read any of them.

                  no these links to news articles, which i have not seen because their poster is on my ignore list, do not address your exact statement. also, news article is not a scientific study.

                  the only actual study you sent does not, again, address your claim at all.

                  have YOU bothered to read it? they all deal with the accuracy of the dogs, none of them suggests stupid take like “the dog is just waiting for its handler to tell him to bark”.

                  we are talking about dogs working at the airport, i am pretty sure that law enforcement at the airport can check basically anyone when they decide to, and they don’t need some elaborate fraud to do that, so your whole conspiracy does not make sense at all.