Opposition Kuomintang (KMT) chair-elect Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) said on Friday that she hopes Taiwan can "make as many friends as possible," when asked to elaborate on her recent remarks that "Vladimir Putin is not a dictator" because he was elected, during an interview with Deutsche Welle (DW).
Incoming KMT chair doubles down on ‘grass was green’ remarks - Focus Taiwan
Dude, mainstream western media openly admits that Putin has mass popular support in Russia, but you keep on doing your copes I guess. Nobody is talking about Putin being any sort of hero here. What’s being said is that there’s no evidence to suggest that elections in Russia need rigging. Meanwhile, the idea that Russia is trying to replace the US as the global hegemon is beyond laughable.
The facts are only relevant on a different subject. But introducing that new subject undermines the original subject and dilutes the initial statement even though it’s factually correct. Gas lighting. You’re also assuming I’m not being persecuted. Of which in survived attempted murder fighting corruption in America. I have the legitimacy to criticize Putin.
You’re also assuming I’m not being persecuted. Of which in survived attempted murder fighting corruption in America. I have the legitimacy to criticize Putin.
Dude, mainstream western media openly admits that Putin has mass popular support in Russia, but you keep on doing your copes I guess. Nobody is talking about Putin being any sort of hero here. What’s being said is that there’s no evidence to suggest that elections in Russia need rigging. Meanwhile, the idea that Russia is trying to replace the US as the global hegemon is beyond laughable.
Any election where the US preferred candidate doesn’t win, is rigged in the eyes of the western media industrial complex.
Including USA elections.
That was a gaslight response. Take care.
Love how you refer to me stating basic facts as gaslighting. Take care.
The facts are only relevant on a different subject. But introducing that new subject undermines the original subject and dilutes the initial statement even though it’s factually correct. Gas lighting. You’re also assuming I’m not being persecuted. Of which in survived attempted murder fighting corruption in America. I have the legitimacy to criticize Putin.
The initial statement was nonsense, and it’s incredible that you keep doubling down on it.
The conclusion doesn’t follow the premise.
Big if true.