• neidu3@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    Lol, Vladdy already tried a nuclear test. Was it last year? This year? I forget… Either way, it failed.

    • humorlessrepost@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      Are you sure you’re not thinking of a test of a nuclear-powered thruster for a non-nuclear weapon?

      That’s an important distinction.

      • Doomsider@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        You mean a dirty nuclear bomb/rocket that can easily swap out a conventional warhead for a nuclear one.

        That is not an important distinction. It was a nuclear test.

        • remon@ani.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          20 hours ago

          Testing a nuclear reactor (which happens all the time, all over the place) is very different from testing a nuclear bomb.

          The distinction literally couldn’t be fucking more important.

          • Doomsider@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            20 hours ago

            OP said nuclear test, not a nuclear bomb. It was definitely a nuclear test.

            Furthermore, this is why Trump is asking for nuclear testing as a reaction to Russia’s big bad new weapon. Also, the whole spend more money on the military angle that the US is obsessed with.

            So there is no distinction because you are just wrong at this point on multiple levels.

            • remon@ani.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              20 hours ago

              And the comment after that clarified that this article is about nuclear bomb test, not a nuclear powered vehicle, to which you then replied with the absolutely ludicrous statement that the distinction isn’t important.

              Feel free to keep arguing, but you’re just putting on your clown make up right now.

              • Doomsider@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                5
                ·
                20 hours ago

                Apparently, you need to comment on another thread where you are not blatantly wrong.

                Also, you are acting pretty trollish for getting put in your place.