geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml to Progressive Politics@lemmy.world · 6 days agoNo Bernie and AOClemmy.mlimagemessage-square47fedilinkarrow-up1103arrow-down127
arrow-up176arrow-down1imageNo Bernie and AOClemmy.mlgeneva_convenience@lemmy.ml to Progressive Politics@lemmy.world · 6 days agomessage-square47fedilink
minus-squareinfinitesunrise@slrpnk.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up29arrow-down3·edit-25 days agoDon’t ask me to run apology for partisan politics, I’m telling you why an Independent isn’t included in a list of Democrats. You could do a lot of good in the world if you channel that righteous aggression somewhere other than your peers.
minus-squaregeneva_convenience@lemmy.mlOPlinkfedilinkarrow-up5arrow-down16·5 days agoBernie isn’t caling for Schumer to be replaced even without being a Democrat. Which makes it worse not better.
minus-squareJakeroxs@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up8arrow-down1·5 days agohttps://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow/watch/maddow-democrats-snatch-defeat-from-the-jaws-of-victory-again-251763269645 He simply stated he wasn’t sure who could/should replace him.
minus-squaregeneva_convenience@lemmy.mlOPlinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down8·5 days agoChris Van Hollen? Rashida Tlaib? Like what is a progressive squad supposed to be if they advocate for Chuck Schumer instead of the "progressives"m
minus-squareyonderbarn@lazysoci.allinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down1·4 days agoRashida is house not senate
minus-squaregeneva_convenience@lemmy.mlOPlinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down1·4 days agoSo Van Hollen. Even a mediocre figure like Elizabeth Warren is available.
minus-squareJakeroxs@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up4arrow-down2·5 days agoThey’re literally not advocating for Schumer though smh
Don’t ask me to run apology for partisan politics, I’m telling you why an Independent isn’t included in a list of Democrats.
You could do a lot of good in the world if you channel that righteous aggression somewhere other than your peers.
Bernie isn’t caling for Schumer to be replaced even without being a Democrat. Which makes it worse not better.
https://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow/watch/maddow-democrats-snatch-defeat-from-the-jaws-of-victory-again-251763269645
He simply stated he wasn’t sure who could/should replace him.
Chris Van Hollen? Rashida Tlaib? Like what is a progressive squad supposed to be if they advocate for Chuck Schumer instead of the "progressives"m
Rashida is house not senate
So Van Hollen. Even a mediocre figure like Elizabeth Warren is available.
They’re literally not advocating for Schumer though smh