• JohnnyEnzyme@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    16 hours ago

    Eh, reading the first article, it sounds like it was even more than that, as in: too much middle-management involved in making key water decisions, too much zeal post-revolution in building new dams, too much waffling and inadequate resoluteness at the leadership levels across several decades.

    In other words, the sanctions were no doubt a major blow, but the real issue seems to be how Iran responded to the blow. Plus a bunch of other stuff on top that didn’t help.

    Meanwhile, something I have no idea about is whether Iran’s regional allies, plus China & Russia, could have used trade and such to help offset the sanctions in the first place…?

    • blarghly@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      13 hours ago

      Meanwhile, something I have no idea about is whether Iran’s regional allies, plus China & Russia, could have used trade and such to help offset the sanctions in the first place…?

      They could almost certainly offset it enormously. Rice and beans shipped in from China are unlikely to cost much more than those from the US.

      My bet is that “85% domestic production” threshold is less a result of sanctions, and more either (a) self-imposed isolationism, or (b) protectionist policies designed to empower one or other political faction in the country.