One federal employee said in a court filing that they ācannot in good conscience pretend to agree with President Trumpās policies.ā
Government employees asked a federal judge Wednesday to block the Trump administration from encouraging job applicants to demonstrate their loyalty to the presidentās agenda.
In aĀ lawsuitĀ filed earlier this month, a group of federal labor unions argues that the White Houseās āmerit hiring planā violates applicantsā First Amendment rights. The plan, put forth by the Office of Personnel Management, includes the following short essay question:
āHow would you help advance the Presidentās Executive Orders and policy priorities in this role? Identify one or two relevant Executive Orders or policy initiatives that are significant to you, and explain how you would help implement them if hired.ā
it could help you understand that us supreme court doesnāt rule behind us borders. whether it actually would, i have no idea.
i understand you are trying unconventional attack vectors, but 2 out of 5 is not a majority, swetie. i see you are as good in math as you are in law. i am done with this discussion, bye.
Butā¦
Iāve linked you an article multiple times, even quoting the relevant sections on forum determinationā¦
It would all happen in the US courts, again, like the link I provided explained in depth. It doesnāt matter where you are, because your commenting on a community hosted in America.
Like youāre right that US SC doesnāt effect me suing you in your countryās legal system, but literally no one is saying that. And I could have sworn we already got on the same page that this would happen in US courts?
And thatās fine, all you have to do is stop replying.