A judge ruled Lindsey Halligan was unconstitutionally appointed. Donald Trump’s team doesn’t care.

The Justice Department is still signing criminal indictments with Lindsey Halligan’s name—almost a day after a judge ruled that she was unlawfully appointed as interim U.S. attorney.

Federal prosecutors were initially instructed to sign court filings in the name of Halligan’s first assistant, after U.S. District Judge Cameron Currie concluded Monday that Halligan had no authority to preside over the Eastern District of Virginia since she was never confirmed by the U.S. Senate. But just an hour later, internal emails instructed the department to continue using Halligan’s name, labeling Currie’s decision ā€œpremature,ā€ reportedĀ MS NOW’s Lisa Rubin.

The move is aĀ flagrant violationĀ of Currie’s court order, which threw out Donald Trump’s cases against former FBI Director James Comey and New York Attorney General Letitia James.

  • Bronzebeard@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    Ā·
    edit-2
    11 hours ago

    Does double jeopardy come into play if a prosecution is thrown out for not being a validly appointment AG, or is it like an annulment where it kind of never happened?

    • mkwt@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      Ā·
      8 hours ago

      Double jeopardy is not a factor in this situation, because the first jeopardy ā€œdoes not attachā€ until a jury is seated and sworn in for trial, or when a guilty plea is accepted. The trial by jury is the ā€œjeopardousā€ part of the criminal justice process. If the case is tossed before that point for any reason, then there is no jeopardy bar to refiling.

      If a trial starts, but ends in a mistrial, then it is usually possible to go to another trial, even though jeopardy ā€œhas attachedā€. A mistrial ruling effectively ā€œunwindsā€ the entire trial like it never happened.

      or is it like an annulment where it kind of never happened?

      This is what Judge Currie said in her opinion. The indictments didn’t happen because they were run entirely by a pretend US attorney.

    • ccunning@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      Ā·
      11 hours ago

      Well weren’t they falsely indicted on the very last day of the statute of limitations for the crimes in question?

      I don’t think double jeopardy would apply, but that would…

      (…this is just the opinion of regular guy without formal education or training in the field in question …)

      • meco03211@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        Ā·
        10 hours ago

        There’s like a 6 month grace period after the SoL if there’s a problem with the indictment, where they could refile. I’m not sure what issues they’re allowed to fix with that grace period, but there is some time there.

      • Bronzebeard@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        Ā·
        7 hours ago

        For Comey’s. I was more concerned with these new ones. Like if whatever this power play was they were pulling, if it was hurting their revenge scheme or of it really didn’t matter much more than wasted time.