• thedarkfly@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    14 hours ago

    “Bloodmouth” is clearly trying to be a slur (although it’s the first time I see the term). “Carnist” however is just a neologism with meaning “someone who eats meat as part of their alimentation”.

    Words exist to convey meaning, that’s all. Now vegans or vegetarians can be aggressive towards carnists, that’s for sure. Nothing to do with vocabulary.

    • Rooskie91@discuss.online
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 hour ago

      Ugh I hate this attitude. People that say “words are just words” have never had a slur yelled inches from their face.

      If words are just words, then what is hate speech?

    • commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 hours ago

      “Carnist” however is just a neologism with meaning “someone who eats meat as part of their alimentation”.

      that is not what it means

      • thedarkfly@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        10 hours ago

        Then what word would you like people to use for “person eating meat as part of their alimentation”? I ask in good faith, I’m really curious to know your opinion.

        I don’t think that “meat-eater” is necessarily better than “carnist” 😕 Or a negative like “non-vegeterian”? A bit of a mouthful.

          • thedarkfly@feddit.nl
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            8 hours ago

            Alright, that’s pretty good. I wanna nitpick by saying that vegetarians are also omnivorous because omnivorous is digesting “plant and animal matter”, but I don’t know if it would be in good faith :p Thanks for the discussion.